These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25418062)

  • 21. The Combined Use of Correlative and Mechanistic Species Distribution Models Benefits Low Conservation Status Species.
    Rougier T; Lassalle G; Drouineau H; Dumoulin N; Faure T; Deffuant G; Rochard E; Lambert P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139194. PubMed ID: 26426280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicted Shifts in Small Mammal Distributions and Biodiversity in the Altered Future Environment of Alaska: An Open Access Data and Machine Learning Perspective.
    Baltensperger AP; Huettmann F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132054. PubMed ID: 26207828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Linking Dynamic Habitat Selection with Wading Bird Foraging Distributions across Resource Gradients.
    Beerens JM; Noonburg EG; Gawlik DE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128182. PubMed ID: 26107386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Integrated models to support multiobjective ecological restoration decisions.
    Fraser H; Rumpff L; Yen JDL; Robinson D; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1418-1427. PubMed ID: 28339135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How does spatial extent and environmental limits affect the accuracy of species richness estimates from ecological niche models? A case study with North American Pinaceae and Cactaceae.
    Nizamani MM; Papeş M; Wang HF; Harris AJ
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e10007. PubMed ID: 37091570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do traits of plant species predict the efficacy of species distribution models for finding new occurrences?
    McCune JL; Rosner-Katz H; Bennett JR; Schuster R; Kharouba HM
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Jun; 10(11):5001-5014. PubMed ID: 32551077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into species distribution models alters forecasts of climate-mediated range shifts.
    Crase B; Liedloff A; Vesk PA; Fukuda Y; Wintle BA
    Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Aug; 20(8):2566-79. PubMed ID: 24845950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Community structure informs species geographic distributions.
    Montesinos-Navarro A; Estrada A; Font X; Matias MG; Meireles C; Mendoza M; Honrado JP; Prasad HD; Vicente JR; Early R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197877. PubMed ID: 29791491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The analysis of biodiversity using rank abundance distributions.
    Foster SD; Dunstan PK
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 19432789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [[Which factors determine the altitudinal distribution of tropical Andean riverine fishes]?].
    De La Barra E; Zubieta J; Aguilera G; Maldonado M; Pouilly M; Oberdorff T
    Rev Biol Trop; 2016 Mar; 64(1):157-76. PubMed ID: 28862413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicted mixture toxic pressure relates to observed fraction of benthic macrofauna species impacted by contaminant mixtures.
    Posthuma L; de Zwart D
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Sep; 31(9):2175-88. PubMed ID: 22729941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Process-based models of species distributions and the mid-domain effect.
    Connolly SR
    Am Nat; 2005 Jul; 166(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15937785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implications of movement for species distribution models - Rethinking environmental data tools.
    Bruneel S; Gobeyn S; Verhelst P; Reubens J; Moens T; Goethals P
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 628-629():893-905. PubMed ID: 29455139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial turnover in the global avifauna.
    Gaston KJ; Davies RG; Orme CD; Olson VA; Thomas GH; Ding TS; Rasmussen PC; Lennon JJ; Bennett PM; Owens IP; Blackburn TM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jul; 274(1618):1567-74. PubMed ID: 17472910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Harnessing the world's biodiversity data: promise and peril in ecological niche modeling of species distributions.
    Anderson RP
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2012 Jul; 1260():66-80. PubMed ID: 22352858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biodiversity and agro-ecology in field margins.
    De Cauwer B; Reheul D; Nijs I; Milbau A
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(1):17-49. PubMed ID: 16363358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of environmental heterogeneity on species richness depends on community position along the environmental gradient.
    Yang Z; Liu X; Zhou M; Ai D; Wang G; Wang Y; Chu C; Lundholm JT
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15723. PubMed ID: 26508413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modelling landscape constraints on farmland bird species range shifts under climate change.
    Reino L; Triviño M; Beja P; Araújo MB; Figueira R; Segurado P
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 625():1596-1605. PubMed ID: 29996456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The pace of past climate change vs. potential bird distributions and land use in the United States.
    Bateman BL; Pidgeon AM; Radeloff VC; VanDerWal J; Thogmartin WE; Vavrus SJ; Heglund PJ
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Mar; 22(3):1130-44. PubMed ID: 26691721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of sample standardization on mean species detectabilities and estimates of relative differences in species richness among assemblages.
    Cao Y; Hawkins CP; Larsen DP; Van Sickle J
    Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 17879189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.