BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25418606)

  • 1. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Schincaglia GP; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 25418606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-Year data.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CHF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Dec; 45(12):1465-1474. PubMed ID: 30341961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Pohl V; Thoma DS; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia-Garcia A; Taylor TD; Haas R; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Apr; 44(4):438-445. PubMed ID: 28081288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.
    Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 25237669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Tutak M; Pohl V; Hämmerle CHF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2024 Apr; 51(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 38296249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical and histological case series study on calcium sulfate for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed placement of dental implants.
    Dasmah A; Hallman M; Sennerby L; Rasmusson L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 19843103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading.
    Schincaglia GP; Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):1042-51. PubMed ID: 26425812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Shi JY; Gu YX; Qiao SC; Zhuang LF; Zhang XM; Lai HC
    Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():324. PubMed ID: 26223254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants--a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
    Fermergård R; Astrand P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 18254742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short implants placed with or without grafting into atrophic sinuses: the 5-year results of a prospective randomized controlled study.
    Nedir R; Nurdin N; Abi Najm S; El Hage M; Bischof M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):877-886. PubMed ID: 27296955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short (6-mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (≥10-mm) dental implants: a randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up.
    Bechara S; Kubilius R; Veronesi G; Pires JT; Shibli JA; Mangano FG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1097-1107. PubMed ID: 27402427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus augmentation, onlay bone grafting, and combination of both techniques: a long-term retrospective cohort study.
    Schmitt C; Karasholi T; Lutz R; Wiltfang J; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e38-46. PubMed ID: 23075057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants:A 5-year randomised controlled trial.
    Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):315-326. PubMed ID: 31535100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation: a 12-year life-table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants.
    Ferrigno N; Laureti M; Fanali S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 16584416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.
    Yu H; Wang X; Qiu L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 27436543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three-year results of a randomized clinical study.
    Taschieri S; Lolato A; Testori T; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 29193558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
    Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative clinical results after implant placement in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation.
    Schlegel A; Hamel J; Wichmann M; Eitner S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 18548926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafting and simultaneous implant placement in the atrophic maxilla: a pilot study.
    Senyilmaz DP; Kasaboglu O
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):786-9. PubMed ID: 22484871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception.
    Pjetursson BE; Rast C; Brägger U; Schmidlin K; Zwahlen M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 19486079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.