These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25419682)

  • 21. Does preoperative T1 slope affect radiological and functional outcomes after cervical laminoplasty?
    Cho JH; Ha JK; Kim DG; Song KY; Kim YT; Hwang CJ; Lee CS; Lee DH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26):E1575-81. PubMed ID: 25271514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of C2-3 disc angle on postoperative adverse events in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Lee BS; Walsh KM; Lubelski D; Knusel KD; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Schlenk RP; Kalfas IH; Benzel EC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jan; 30(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 30485218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging is associated with baseline neurological status and can predict postoperative recovery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Arvin B; Kalsi-Ryan S; Mercier D; Furlan JC; Massicotte EM; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):1170-6. PubMed ID: 23462574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of Cervical Spine Deformity on Preoperative Disease Severity and Postoperative Outcomes Following Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Sub-analysis of AOSpine North America and International Studies.
    Kato S; Nouri A; Wu D; Nori S; Tetreault L; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Feb; 43(4):248-254. PubMed ID: 28658043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patient phenotypes associated with outcome following surgery for mild degenerative cervical myelopathy: a principal component regression analysis.
    Badhiwala JH; Witiw CD; Nassiri F; Jaja BNR; Akbar MA; Mansouri A; Merali Z; Ibrahim GM; Wilson JR; Fehlings MG
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2220-2231. PubMed ID: 29746963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.
    Tang JA; Scheer JK; Smith JS; Deviren V; Bess S; Hart RA; Lafage V; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Sep; 71(3):662-9; discussion 669. PubMed ID: 22653395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-Year Results of the Prospective Spine Treatment Outcomes Study: An Analysis of Complication Rates, Predictors of Their Development, and Effect on Patient Derived Outcomes at 2 Years for Surgical Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
    Gerling MC; Radcliff K; Isaacs R; Bianco K; Jalai CM; Worley NJ; Parmar J; Poorman GW; Horn SR; Moon JY; Arnold PM; Vaccaro AR; Passias P
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():247-253. PubMed ID: 28673888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Correlates with Short-Term Myelopathy Outcome in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
    Vedantam A; Rao A; Kurpad SN; Jirjis MB; Eckardt G; Schmit BD; Wang MC
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 97():489-494. PubMed ID: 27046013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative effectiveness of ventral vs dorsal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Ghogawala Z; Martin B; Benzel EC; Dziura J; Magge SN; Abbed KM; Bisson EF; Shahid J; Coumans JV; Choudhri TF; Steinmetz MP; Krishnaney AA; King JT; Butler WE; Barker FG; Heary RF
    Neurosurgery; 2011 Mar; 68(3):622-30; discussion 630-1. PubMed ID: 21164373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.
    Lau D; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 26091438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of Preoperative Sagittal Balance on Cervical Laminoplasty Outcomes.
    Oshima Y; Takeshita K; Taniguchi Y; Matsubayashi Y; Doi T; Ohya J; Soma K; Kato S; Oka H; Chikuda H; Tanaka S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Nov; 41(21):E1265-E1270. PubMed ID: 27054450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients.
    Scheer JK; Passias PG; Sorocean AM; Boniello AJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Kim HJ; Protopsaltis TS; Gupta M; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Lafage V; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 26360147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
    Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mild diabetes is not a contraindication for surgical decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America multicenter prospective study (CSM).
    Arnold PM; Fehlings MG; Kopjar B; Yoon ST; Massicotte EM; Vaccaro AR; Brodke DS; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; Woodard EJ; Banco RJ; Chapman JR; Janssen ME; Bono CM; Sasso RC; Dekutoski MB; Gokaslan ZL
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 23981820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Association of Cervical Spine Alignment with Neurologic Recovery in a Prospective Cohort of Patients with Surgical Myelopathy: Analysis of a Series of 124 Cases.
    Shamji MF; Mohanty C; Massicotte EM; Fehlings MG
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 86():112-9. PubMed ID: 26409089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the outcome and potential complications of surgical treatment.
    Sherief T; White J; Bommireddy R; Klezl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(5):328-34. PubMed ID: 25105673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Despite worse baseline status depressed patients achieved outcomes similar to those in nondepressed patients after surgery for cervical deformity.
    Poorman GW; Passias PG; Horn SR; Frangella NJ; Daniels AH; Hamilton DK; Kim H; Sciubba D; Diebo BG; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Kelly MP; Smith JS; Neuman BJ; Shaffrey CI; LaFage V; LaFage R; Ames CP; Hart R; Mundis GM; Eastlack R;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E10. PubMed ID: 29191101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk Factors for and Clinical Outcomes of Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from the AOSpine International and North America Studies.
    Nagoshi N; Tetreault L; Nakashima H; Arnold PM; Barbagallo G; Kopjar B; Fehlings MG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jul; 99(13):1069-1077. PubMed ID: 28678119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost and quality of life outcome analysis of postoperative infections after subaxial dorsal cervical fusions.
    Kuhns BD; Lubelski D; Alvin MD; Taub JS; McGirt MJ; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 25615630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.