453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420084)
1. Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation--a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones.
Theunisse HJ; Joemai RM; Maal TJ; Geleijns J; Mylanus EA; Verbist BM
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 25420084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation.
Ruivo J; Mermuys K; Bacher K; Kuhweide R; Offeciers E; Casselman JW
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 19174709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Struffert T; Hertel V; Kyriakou Y; Krause J; Engelhorn T; Schick B; Iro H; Hornung J; Doerfler A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 19883180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
Grunz JP; Kunz AS; Gietzen CH; Weng AM; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Schmitt R; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108659. PubMed ID: 31520930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone-Beam CT Compared to Multi-Slice CT for the Diagnostic Analysis of Conductive Hearing Loss: A Feasibility Study.
Kemp P; Stralen JV; De Graaf P; Berkhout E; Horssen PV; Merkus P
J Int Adv Otol; 2020 Aug; 16(2):222-226. PubMed ID: 32784161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study.
Nateghifard K; Low D; Awofala L; Srikanthan D; Kuthubutheen J; Daly M; Chan H; Irish J; Chen J; Lin V; Le TN
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):65. PubMed ID: 31753027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone Beam CT Versus Multislice CT: Radiologic Diagnostic Agreement in the Postoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implantation.
Razafindranaly V; Truy E; Pialat JB; Martinon A; Bourhis M; Boublay N; Faure F; Ltaïef-Boudrigua A
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1246-54. PubMed ID: 27518208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences of radiological artefacts in cochlear implantation in temporal bone and complete head.
Diogo I; Franke N; Steinbach-Hundt S; Mandapathil M; Weiss R; Werner JA; Güldner C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 23938153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose saving through the use of cone-beam CT in hearing-impaired patients.
Faccioli N; Barillari M; Guariglia S; Zivelonghi E; Rizzotti A; Cerini R; Mucelli RP
Radiol Med; 2009 Dec; 114(8):1308-18. PubMed ID: 19789956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative computed tomography imaging of pediatric patients with craniosynostosis: radiation dose and image quality comparison between multi-slice computed tomography and O-arm cone-beam computed tomography.
Kaasalainen T; Männistö V; Mäkelä T; Suojanen J; Nuorala A; Heliövaara A; Leikola J
Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Jul; 53(8):1704-1712. PubMed ID: 36967418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography in temporal bone imaging for surgical treatment.
Erovic BM; Chan HH; Daly MJ; Pothier DD; Yu E; Coulson C; Lai P; Irish JC
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jan; 150(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 24170658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of the human cochlea using micro-computed tomography before and after cochlear implantation: comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
Karkas A; Boureille P; Laroche N; Vico L; Bergandi F; Marotte H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3131-3140. PubMed ID: 36604323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-beam CT versus Multidetector CT in Postoperative Cochlear Implant Imaging: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.
Helal RA; Jacob R; Elshinnawy MA; Othman AI; Al-Dhamari IM; Paulus DW; Abdelaziz TT
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2021 Jan; 42(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 33414229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of radiation doses imparted during 128-, 256-, 384-multislice CT-scanners and cone beam computed tomography for intra- and perioperative cochlear implant assessment.
Guberina N; Dietrich U; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Forsting M; Ringelstein A
Am J Otolaryngol; 2017; 38(6):649-653. PubMed ID: 28942233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of cone-beam computed tomography to determine cochlear implant electrode position in human temporal bones.
Saeed SR; Selvadurai D; Beale T; Biggs N; Murray B; Gibson P; Risi F; Boyd P
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1338-44. PubMed ID: 24809280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
