These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420223)
1. A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. Mazei J; Hüffmeier J; Freund PA; Stuhlmacher AF; Bilke L; Hertel G Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):85-104. PubMed ID: 25420223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Kugler KG; Reif JAM; Kaschner T; Brodbeck FC Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 144(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 29239629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Negotiating gender roles: gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women's fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Amanatullah ET; Morris MW J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Feb; 98(2):256-67. PubMed ID: 20085399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The mind and heart (literally) of the negotiator: personality and contextual determinants of experiential reactions and economic outcomes in negotiation. Dimotakis N; Conlon DE; Ilies R J Appl Psychol; 2012 Jan; 97(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 21967294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asking for less (but receiving more): Women avoid impasses and outperform men when negotiators have weak alternatives. Ma A; Ponce de Leon R; Rosette AS J Appl Psychol; 2024 Jul; 109(7):1145-1158. PubMed ID: 37824267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward a culture-by-context perspective on negotiation: negotiating teams in the United States and Taiwan. Gelfand MJ; Brett J; Gunia BC; Imai L; Huang TJ; Hsu BF J Appl Psychol; 2013 May; 98(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 23477378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Constraints and triggers: situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Bowles HR; Babcock L; McGinn KL J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 89(6):951-65. PubMed ID: 16393027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The dynamics of gender and alternatives in negotiation. Dannals JE; Zlatev JJ; Halevy N; Neale MA J Appl Psychol; 2021 Nov; 106(11):1655-1672. PubMed ID: 33411548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High construal level can help negotiators to reach integrative agreements: The role of information exchange and judgement accuracy. Wening S; Keith N; Abele AE Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 55(2):206-26. PubMed ID: 26403268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. Small DA; Gelfand M; Babcock L; Gettman H J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Oct; 93(4):600-13. PubMed ID: 17892334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gender differences related to heterosexual condom use: the influence of negotiation styles. Carter JA; McNair LD; Corbin WR; Williams M J Sex Marital Ther; 1999; 25(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 10407794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance. O'connor KM; Arnold JA; Burris ER J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):350-62. PubMed ID: 15769243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Condom negotiation strategies as a mediator of the relationship between self-efficacy and condom use. French SE; Holland KJ J Sex Res; 2013; 50(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 22126308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Personality similarity in negotiations: Testing the dyadic effects of similarity in interpersonal traits and the use of emotional displays on negotiation outcomes. Wilson KS; DeRue DS; Matta FK; Howe M; Conlon DE J Appl Psychol; 2016 Oct; 101(10):1405-1421. PubMed ID: 27336910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dark side of subjective value in sequential negotiations: The mediating role of pride and anger. Becker WJ; Curhan JR J Appl Psychol; 2018 Jan; 103(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 28805424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Moving outside the board room: A proof-of-concept study on the impact of walking while negotiating. Oppezzo M; Neale MA; Gross JJ; Prochaska JJ; Schwartz DL; Aikens RC; Palaniappan L PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282681. PubMed ID: 36930666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Too much information: the perils of nondiagnostic information in negotiations. Wiltermuth SS; Neale MA J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 21244131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the relative importance of individual-level characteristics and dyadic interaction effects in negotiations: Variance partitioning evidence from a twins study. Elfenbein HA; Eisenkraft N; Curhan JR; DiLalla LF J Appl Psychol; 2018 Jan; 103(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 28805427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The polarizing effect of arousal on negotiation. Brown AD; Curhan JR Psychol Sci; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1928-35. PubMed ID: 23925306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]