These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420433)
1. Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers' interpretation: a randomized controlled trial. Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Hopewell S; Baron G; Boutron I BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():123. PubMed ID: 25420433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners' confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Buffel du Vaure C; Boutron I; Perrodeau E; Ravaud P BMC Med; 2014 Apr; 12():69. PubMed ID: 24779384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences. Hopewell S; Boutron I; Altman DG; Ravaud P J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1488-95. PubMed ID: 25890806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study. Scherer RW; Huynh L; Ervin AM; Taylor J; Dickersin K BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jun; 13():79. PubMed ID: 23773868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review. Hennessy EA; Tanner-Smith EE; Finch AJ; Sathe N; Kugley S Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-86. PubMed ID: 37131375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers. Joyce P; Moore ZE; Christie J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Dec; 12(12):CD012132. PubMed ID: 30536917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the statistical significance of results and spin on readers' interpretation of the results in an abstract for a hypothetical clinical trial: a randomised trial. Jankowski S; Boutron I; Clarke M BMJ Open; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e056503. PubMed ID: 35396295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do evidence summaries increase health policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review. Petkovic J; Welch V; Jacob MH; Yoganathan M; Ayala AP; Cunningham H; Tugwell P Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-52. PubMed ID: 37131376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bigna JJ; Um LN; Nansseu JR Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):174. PubMed ID: 27737710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-publication and publication bias in reproductive medicine: a cohort analysis. Lensen S; Jordan V; Showell M; Showell E; Shen V; Venetis C; Farquhar C Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1658-1666. PubMed ID: 28854591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Emadi A; Chua JV; Talwani R; Bentzen SM; Baddley J Trials; 2020 Oct; 21(1):897. PubMed ID: 33115543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and clarity in systematic review abstracts: an empirical study. Tsou AY; Treadwell JR Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):447-458. PubMed ID: 27764903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]