These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420490)

  • 1. The impact of interface design during an initial high-technology AAC experience: a collective case study of people with aphasia.
    Dietz A; Weissling K; Griffith J; McKelvey M; Macke D
    Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Dec; 30(4):314-28. PubMed ID: 25420490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supporting narrative retells for people with aphasia using augmentative and alternative communication: photographs or line drawings? Text or no text?
    Griffith J; Dietz A; Weissling K
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 May; 23(2):S213-24. PubMed ID: 24687095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Visual Scene Displays as Communication Support Options for People with Chronic, Severe Aphasia: A Summary of AAC Research and Future Research Directions.
    Beukelman DR; Hux K; Dietz A; McKelvey M; Weissling K
    Augment Altern Commun; 2015; 31(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 26044911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring high-technology augmentative and alternative communication interfaces: the effect of age and technology experience.
    Nakkawita SG; Hartzheim DU; Donovan NJ
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Feb; 19(2):313-324. PubMed ID: 35709165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of two layouts on high technology AAC navigation and content location by people with aphasia.
    Wallace SE; Hux K
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Mar; 9(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 23692409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A computerised communication aid for people with aphasia.
    van de Sandt-Koenderman M; Wiegers J; Hardy P
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(9):529-33. PubMed ID: 16040556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes Toward and Perceived Communicative Competence of Individuals with Aphasia Using Speech-Generating Devices.
    Brock KL; Koul R; Corwin M; Schlosser RW
    Augment Altern Commun; 2022 Mar; 38(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 35296192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of augmented input on the auditory comprehension of narratives for people with aphasia: a pilot investigation.
    Dada S; Stockley N; Wallace SE; Koul R
    Augment Altern Commun; 2019 Jun; 35(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 31174431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-technology augmentative communication for adults with post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review.
    Russo MJ; Prodan V; Meda NN; Carcavallo L; Muracioli A; Sabe L; Bonamico L; Allegri RF; Olmos L
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 May; 14(5):355-370. PubMed ID: 28446056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Building on residual speech: a portable processing prosthesis for aphasia.
    Linebarger MC; Romania JF; Fink RB; Bartlett MR; Schwartz MF
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(9):1401-14. PubMed ID: 19319763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Light technology augmentative communication for acute care and rehab settings.
    Bahr E
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2008; 15(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 18782741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) for adults with severe aphasia: where we stand and how we can go further.
    Jacobs B; Drew R; Ogletree BT; Pierce K
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Nov 4-18; 26(21-22):1231-40. PubMed ID: 15513721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. N400 brain responses to spoken phrases paired with photographs of scenes: implications for visual scene displays in AAC systems.
    Wilkinson KM; Stutzman A; Seisler A
    Augment Altern Commun; 2015 Mar; 31(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 25521434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How Responsiveness From a Communication Partner Affects Story Retell in Aphasia: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings.
    Harmon TG; Jacks A; Haley KL; Bailliard A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2020 Feb; 29(1):142-156. PubMed ID: 31851828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.
    Judge S; Townend G
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 23889833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of personal relevance and contextualization on word-picture matching by people with aphasia.
    McKelvey ML; Hux K; Dietz A; Beukelman DR
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Feb; 19(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 20139353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interventions using high-technology communication devices: a state of the art review.
    Baxter S; Enderby P; Evans P; Judge S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 22653226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the Visual Attention Patterns and Identification Accuracy of Adults With Aphasia for Grids and Visual Scene Displays.
    Thiessen A; Brown J; Basinger M
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Sep; 31(5):1979-1991. PubMed ID: 35858268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary investigation of visual attention to complex AAC visual scene displays in individuals with and without developmental disabilities.
    O'Neill T; Wilkinson KM; Light J
    Augment Altern Commun; 2019 Sep; 35(3):240-250. PubMed ID: 31305160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A computerised communication aid in severe aphasia: an exploratory study.
    Van de Sandt-Koenderman WM; Wiegers J; Wielaert SM; Duivenvoorden HJ; Ribbers GM
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 29(22):1701-9. PubMed ID: 17852317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.