These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420668)

  • 1. Dynamic characteristics of signatures: effects of writer style on genuine and simulated signatures.
    Mohammed L; Found B; Caligiuri M; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25420668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dynamic character of disguise behavior for text-based, mixed, and stylized signatures.
    Mohammed LA; Found B; Caligiuri M; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S136-41. PubMed ID: 20950317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonadherence to the isochrony principle in forged signatures.
    Caligiuri MP; Mohammed LA; Found B; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):228-32. PubMed ID: 23084659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic handwriting examiners' opinions on the process of production of disguised and simulated signatures.
    Bird C; Found B; Ballantyne K; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Feb; 195(1-3):103-7. PubMed ID: 20060668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The probative character of Forensic Handwriting Examiners' identification and elimination opinions on questioned signatures.
    Found B; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jun; 178(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18367353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinematics of signature writing in healthy aging.
    Caligiuri MP; Kim C; Landy KM
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1020-4. PubMed ID: 24673648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison.
    Sita J; Found B; Rogers DK
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1117-24. PubMed ID: 12353558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are expert penmen better than lay people at producing simulations of a model signature?
    Dewhurst T; Found B; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Aug; 180(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 18703294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An insight into forensic document examiner expertise for discriminating between forged and disguised signatures.
    Dyer AG; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1154-9. PubMed ID: 18624887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of extrinsic motivation on signature authorship opinions in forensic signature blind trials.
    Dewhurst TN; Found B; Ballantyne KN; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():127-32. PubMed ID: 24529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of signature handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratio based on comparative measurement of relevant dynamic features.
    Chen XH; Champod C; Yang X; Shi SP; Luo YW; Wang N; Wang YC; Lu QM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jan; 282():101-110. PubMed ID: 29182954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic Analysis of Digital Dynamic Signatures: New Methods for Data Treatment and Feature Evaluation.
    Linden J; Marquis R; Mazzella W
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):382-391. PubMed ID: 27859241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic signatures: A review of dynamic feature variation and forensic methodology.
    Linden J; Marquis R; Bozza S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():216-229. PubMed ID: 30241096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining Authenticity: An Initial Exploration of the Suitability of Handwritten Electronic Signatures.
    Heckeroth J; Boywitt CD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():144-154. PubMed ID: 28364722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual attention and expertise for forensic signature analysis.
    Dyer AG; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1397-404. PubMed ID: 17199627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommendations for capturing signatures digitally to optimize their suitability for forensic handwriting examination.
    Geistová Čakovská B; Kalantzis N; Dziedzic T; Fernandes C; Zimmer J; Branco MJ; Heckeroth J; Spjuth KA; Kupferschmid E; Vaccarone P; Kerkoff A
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Mar; 66(2):743-747. PubMed ID: 33206397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A feature based comparison of pen and swipe based signature characteristics.
    Robertson J; Guest R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Oct; 43():169-82. PubMed ID: 26097008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating forensic document examiners' skill relating to opinions on photocopied signatures.
    Found B; Rogers DK
    Sci Justice; 2005; 45(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 16686271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it possible to estimate sex from signatures and handwriting? A review of literature, observations, and future perspectives.
    Meena R; Krishan K; Ghosh A; Kanchan T
    Naturwissenschaften; 2023 Jul; 110(4):32. PubMed ID: 37395867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Features of digitally captured signatures vs. pen and paper signatures: Similar or completely different?
    Heckeroth J; Kupferschmid E; Dziedzic T; Kalantzis N; Geistová Čakovská B; Fernandes C; Branco MJ; Axelsson Spjuth K; Kerkhoff A; Vaccarone P; Zimmer J; Schmidt P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110587. PubMed ID: 33248328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.