These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420678)

  • 1. Maximal and sub-maximal functional lifting performance at different platform heights.
    Savage RJ; Jaffrey MA; Billing DC; Ham DJ
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(5):762-9. PubMed ID: 25420678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between maximal lifting capacity and maximum acceptable lift in strength-based soldiering tasks.
    Savage RJ; Best SA; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jul; 26 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 22643137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the relationship between discrete and repetitive lifting performance in military tasks.
    Savage RJ; Best SA; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ; Doyle TL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Mar; 28(3):767-73. PubMed ID: 23897024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.
    Hydren JR; Borges AS; Sharp MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1142-1164. PubMed ID: 28135227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple anthropometric and physical performance tests to predict maximal box-lifting ability.
    Williams AG; Wilkinson M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 May; 21(2):638-42. PubMed ID: 17530955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can simple anthropometric and physical performance tests track training-induced changes in maximal box-lifting ability?
    Williams AG; Rayson MP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):661-70. PubMed ID: 16720527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding Anthropometric Characteristics Associated With Performance in Manual Lifting Tasks.
    Beck B; Middleton KJ; Billing DC; Caldwell JN; Carstairs GL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):755-761. PubMed ID: 28682931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.
    Stevenson JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Greenhorn DR; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 2714247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Chinese MAWL be used for designing manual handling tasks?
    Chen YL
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 12570404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obesity does not reduce maximum acceptable weights of lift.
    Singh D; Park W; Levy MS
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18501874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of floor slope on submaximal lifting capacity.
    Wickel EE; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():283-9. PubMed ID: 15133972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Box Lift and Place Assessment is Related to Performance of Several Military Manual Handling Tasks.
    Carstairs GL; Ham DJ; Savage RJ; Best SA; Beck B; Doyle TL
    Mil Med; 2016 Mar; 181(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 26926751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.
    Abadi AS; Mazlomi A; Saraji GN; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    Electron Physician; 2015 Oct; 7(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 26516443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sensitivity of a military-based occupational fitness test of muscular strength.
    Middleton KJ; Carstairs GL; Caldwell JN; Billing DC; Beck B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():255-259. PubMed ID: 28166884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of basic training on material handling ability and physical fitness of British Army recruits.
    Williams AG; Rayson MP; Jones DA
    Ergonomics; 1999 Aug; 42(8):1114-24. PubMed ID: 10504891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.
    Wu SP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10424184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effectiveness of Basic Military Training To Improve Functional Lifting Strength in New Recruits.
    Drain JR; Sampson JA; Billing DC; Burley SD; Linnane DM; Groeller H
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S173-7. PubMed ID: 26506184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.