These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420678)

  • 21. The Effectiveness of Basic Military Training To Improve Functional Lifting Strength in New Recruits.
    Drain JR; Sampson JA; Billing DC; Burley SD; Linnane DM; Groeller H
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S173-7. PubMed ID: 26506184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A method for developing organisation-wide manual handling based physical employment standards in a military context.
    Carstairs GL; Ham DJ; Savage RJ; Best SA; Beck B; Billing DC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 29778310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physiological limits in lifting.
    Khalil TM; Genaidy AM; Asfour SS; Vinciguerra T
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Apr; 46(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 4003273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables.
    Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Appl Ergon; 1993 Aug; 24(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 15676920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Manual handling performance: the effects of menstrual cycle phase.
    Birch KM; Reilly T
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct; 42(10):1317-32. PubMed ID: 10582502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting Endurance Time in a Repetitive Lift and Carry Task Using Linear Mixed Models.
    Beck B; Ham DJ; Best SA; Carstairs GL; Savage RJ; Straney L; Caldwell JN
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158418. PubMed ID: 27379902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resistance training and the enhancement of the gains in material-handling ability and physical fitness of British Army recruits during basic training.
    Williams AG; Rayson MP; Jones DA
    Ergonomics; 2002 Mar; 45(4):267-79. PubMed ID: 12028724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.
    Fothergill DM; Grieve DW; Pinder AD
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 72(5-6):430-9. PubMed ID: 8925813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers.
    Lee TH
    Ind Health; 2005 Apr; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interaction of chemical defense clothing and high terrestrial altitudes on lift/carry and marksmanship performance.
    Muza SR; Jackson R; Rock PB; Roach J; Lyons T; Cymerman A
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2000 Jul; 71(7):668-77. PubMed ID: 10902929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Determination of maximum acceptable and comfortable height during one-handed lifting.
    Lee KS; Hwang J
    Work; 2020; 65(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 32116269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationships of physical performance tests to military-relevant tasks in women.
    Szivak TK; Kraemer WJ; Nindl BC; Gotshalk LA; Volek JS; Gomez AL; Dunn-Lewis C; Looney DP; Comstock BA; Hooper DR; Flanagan SD; Maresh CM
    US Army Med Dep J; 2014; ():20-6. PubMed ID: 24706238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of floor slope on sub-maximal lifting capacity and technique.
    Wickel EE; Reiser RF
    Appl Ergon; 2008 May; 39(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 18096131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity.
    Jacobs I; Bell DG; Pope J
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1988; 57(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 3349979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Jerry can carriage is an effective predictor of stretcher carry performance.
    Beck B; Carstairs GL; Caldwell Odgers JN; Doyle TL; Middleton KJ
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):813-20. PubMed ID: 26526182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A quantification of the physiological demands of the army emergency responder in the Australian army.
    Tofari PJ; Laing Treloar AK; Silk AJ
    Mil Med; 2013 May; 178(5):487-94. PubMed ID: 23756005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Loads on the lumbar spine during a work capacity assessment test.
    Cole MH; Grimshaw PN; Burden AM
    Work; 2004; 23(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 15502297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.