These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420737)
1. Difference in adenoma detection rates according to colonoscopic withdrawal times and the level of expertise. Kim YD; Bae WK; Choi YH; Jwa YJ; Jung SK; Lee BH; Paik WH; Kim JW; Kim NH; Kim KA; Lee JS Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 64(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 25420737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques. Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Correlation between adenoma detection rate and advanced adenoma detection rate]. Lee SY; Kim NH; Chae HB; Han KJ; Lee TH; Jang CM; Yoo KM; Jung YS; Park JH; Kim HJ; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI; Park DI Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 25073667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates. Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy. Gromski MA; Miller CA; Lee SH; Park ES; Lee TH; Park SH; Chung IK; Kim SJ; Hwangbo Y Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1337-42. PubMed ID: 22083333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos). Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists. Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates. Madhoun MF; Tierney WM Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans. El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study. Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of fellowship training level on colonoscopy quality and efficiency metrics. Bitar H; Zia H; Bashir M; Parava P; Hanafi M; Tierney W; Madhoun M Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):378-387. PubMed ID: 29679692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions. Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Snover DC; Abdel Jawad KH; Cummings OW; Rex DK Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Feb; 13(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 25083562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective study of endoscopist-blinded colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates in a tertiary hospital. Lim G; Viney SK; Chapman BA; Frizelle FA; Gearry RB N Z Med J; 2012 Jun; 125(1356):52-9. PubMed ID: 22729059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A; Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study. Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K Dig Endosc; 2024 Jan; 36(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 37953649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing. Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality. Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]