These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420791)

  • 1. STACCATO (Assessment of Stent sTrut Apposition and Coverage in Coronary ArTeries with Optical coherence tomography in patients with STEMI, NSTEMI and stable/unstable angina undergoing everolimus vs. biolimus A9-eluting stent implantation): a randomised controlled trial.
    Adriaenssens T; Ughi GJ; Dubois C; De Cock D; Onsea K; Bennett J; Wiyono S; Sinnaeve P; Coosemans M; Ferdinande B; Belmans A; D'hooge J; Desmet W
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Apr; 11(14):e1619-26. PubMed ID: 25420791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vascular response to everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents versus everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds--an optical coherence tomography substudy of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Kallinikou Z; Arroyo D; Togni M; Lehman S; Corpataux N; Cook M; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Puricel SG; Cook S
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2016; 146():w14274. PubMed ID: 26766027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year vascular responses to drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer: An optical coherence tomography sub-study of the NEXT.
    Katayama Y; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Ino Y; Kimura K; Okura H; Shinke T; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(6):530-536. PubMed ID: 28536015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome - the Activity of Platelets after Inhibition and Cardiovascular Events: Optical Coherence Tomography (APICE OCT) study.
    Chieffo A; Buchanan GL; Parodi G; Versaci F; Bianchi RM; Valenti R; Saccà S; Mongiardo A; Span S; Migliorini A; Spaccarotella C; Reimers B; Antoniucci D; Indolfi C; Ferrari A; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Colombo A
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Dec; 10(8):916-23. PubMed ID: 24974806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. COmplex coronary Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a strategy using a dedicated self-expanding biolimus-eluting stent versus a culotte strategy using everolimus-eluting stents: primary results of the COBRA trial.
    Dubois C; Bennett J; Dens J; De Cock D; Desmet W; Belmans A; Ughi GJ; Sinnaeve P; Vrolix M; D'hooge J; Adriaenssens T
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Apr; 11(13):1457-67. PubMed ID: 25947278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of early strut coverage between zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents using optical coherence tomography.
    Kim S; Kim JS; Shin DH; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Cho YK; Nam CW; Hur SH; Jang Y; Hong MK
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 111(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 23040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optical coherence tomography analysis of the stenting of saphenous vein graft (SOS) Xience V Study: use of the everolimus-eluting stent in saphenous vein graft lesions.
    Papayannis AC; Michael TT; Yangirova D; Abdel-Karim AR; Kohlhaas J; Mahmood A; Addo T; Haagen D; Makke L; Roesle M; Rangan B; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 24(8):390-4. PubMed ID: 22865309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with permanent polymer coatings assessed by optical coherence tomography.
    Tada T; Kastrati A; Byrne RA; Schuster T; Cuni R; King LA; Cassese S; Joner M; Pache J; Massberg S; Schömig A; Mehilli J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 30(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 24452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.
    Buszman PP; Michalak MJ; Pruski M; Fernandez C; Jelonek M; Janas A; Savard C; Gwiazdowska-Nowotka B; Żurakowski A; Wojakowski W; Buszman PE; Milewski K
    Cardiol J; 2016; 23(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 27976797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optical coherence tomography study of healing characteristics of paclitaxel-eluting balloons vs. everolimus-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis: the SEDUCE (Safety and Efficacy of a Drug elUting balloon in Coronary artery rEstenosis) randomised clinical trial.
    Adriaenssens T; Dens J; Ughi G; Bennett J; Dubois C; Sinnaeve P; Wiyono S; Coosemans M; Belmans A; D'hooge J; Vrolix M; Desmet W
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Aug; 10(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 25138182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of biolimus A9-eluting (Nobori) and everolimus-eluting (Promus Element) stents in patients with de novo native long coronary artery lesions: a randomized Long Drug-Eluting Stent V trial.
    Lee JY; Park DW; Kim YH; Ahn JM; Kim WJ; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Yun SC; Yang TH; Lee BK; Lee NH; Yang JY; Shin WY; Park HS; Kim KS; Hur SH; Lee SY; Park JS; Choi YS; Lee SU; Her SH; Park SJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 7(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 24823426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent) and COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) randomised trials.
    Vlachojannis GJ; Puricel S; Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Smits PC; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Mar; 12(16):1970-1977. PubMed ID: 27802927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of neointimal coverage between everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography substudy of the RESET (Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial).
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Kawamura M; Sumiyoshi T; Ino Y; Morino Y; Tanabe K; Kadota K; Kimura T;
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Sep; 11(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 26390517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optical coherence tomography findings: insights from the "randomised multicentre trial investigating angiographic outcomes of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in chronic total occlusions" (PRISON IV) trial.
    Teeuwen K; Spoormans EM; Bennett J; Dubois C; Desmet W; Ughi GJ; Belmans A; Kelder JC; Tijssen JGP; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ; Adriaenssens T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(5):e522-e530. PubMed ID: 28512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of different stent alloys on human vascular response to everolimus-eluting stent: an optical coherence tomography study: the OCTEVEREST.
    Guagliumi G; Capodanno D; Ikejima H; Bezerra HG; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Fiocca L; Lortkipanidze N; Vassileva A; Tahara S; Valsecchi O; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):510-8. PubMed ID: 22431208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vascular response to drug-eluting stent with biodegradable vs. durable polymer. Optical coherence tomography substudy of the NEXT.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Fusazaki T; Okura H; Shinke T; Ino Y; Hasegawa T; Takashima H; Takamisawa I; Yamaguchi H; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    Circ J; 2014; 78(10):2408-14. PubMed ID: 25099476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized comparison of acute stent malapposition between platinum-chromium versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents.
    Kim BK; Shin DH; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Feb; 31(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 25345751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of vascular responses after different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents implantation detected by optical coherence tomography.
    Ohtani H; Kimura S; Sugiyama T; Hishikari K; Misawa T; Mizusawa M; Hayasaka K; Yamakami Y; Kojima K; Sagawa Y; Hikita H; Ashikaga T; Takahashi A; Isobe M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):177-186. PubMed ID: 27761750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomised comparison of vascular response to biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting and permanent polymer everolimus eluting stents: An optical coherence tomography study.
    Koppara T; Tada T; Xhepa E; Kufner S; Byrne RA; Ibrahim T; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Joner M
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 258():42-49. PubMed ID: 29544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.