248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25420942)
41. In vivo assessment of artefacts in MRI images caused by conventional twistflex and various fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers.
Roser CJ; Hilgenfeld T; Saleem MA; Rückschloß T; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Jul; 85(4):279-288. PubMed ID: 36700953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Influence of common fixed retainers on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Shalish M; Dykstein N; Friedlander-Barenboim S; Ben-David E; Gomori JM; Chaushu S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):604-9. PubMed ID: 25919106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ripple artifact reduction using slice overlap in slice encoding for metal artifact correction.
den Harder JC; van Yperen GH; Blume UA; Bos C
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Jan; 73(1):318-24. PubMed ID: 24488701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].
Cao Z; Chen LL; Gong XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(26):1855-8. PubMed ID: 19040024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips.
Genson CC; Blane CE; Helvie MA; Waits SA; Chenevert TL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 17242244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware: comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI.
Farrelly C; Davarpanah A; Brennan SA; Sampson M; Eustace SJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W60-4. PubMed ID: 20028892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI.
Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):703-6. PubMed ID: 23290476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study.
Roser C; Hilgenfeld T; Sen S; Badrow T; Zingler S; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1423-1431. PubMed ID: 32785849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws.
Petersilge CA; Lewin JS; Duerk JL; Yoo JU; Ghaneyem AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1213-8. PubMed ID: 8615272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative study of signal decay due to magnetic susceptibility interfaces: MRI simulations and experiments.
De Guio F; Benoit-Cattin H; Davenel A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1607-10. PubMed ID: 18002279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [MRI safety aspects and artifacts of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale occluders at 1.5 tesla: a phantom study].
Bock M; Mohrs OK; Voigtlaender T; Kauczor HU; Semmler W
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 16508833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of receiver bandwidth on MRI artifacts caused by orthodontic brackets composed of different alloys.
Abdala-Junior R; No-Cortes J; Arita ES; Ackerman JL; da Silva RLB; Kim JH; Cortes ARG
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 34988002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Image correction during large and rapid B(0) variations in an open MRI system with permanent magnets using navigator echoes and phase compensation.
Li J; Wang Y; Jiang Y; Xie H; Li G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 27(7):988-93. PubMed ID: 19369023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Should the orthodontic brackets always be removed prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?
Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir A; Rahmati-Kamel M
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2016; 6(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 27195213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. MRI safety and imaging artifacts evaluated for a cannulated screw used for guided growth surgery.
Thompson RM; Fowler E; Culo B; Shellock FG
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Feb; 66():219-225. PubMed ID: 31704394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Artefacts and ferromagnetism dependent on different metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. An experimental study].
Thomsen M; Schneider U; Breusch SJ; Hansmann J; Freund M
Orthopade; 2001 Aug; 30(8):540-4. PubMed ID: 11552395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Macroscopic susceptibility in ultra high field MRI.
Abduljalil AM; Robitaille PM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(6):832-41. PubMed ID: 10589555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. What causes the "wet diaper" artifact? computed tomography and magnetic resonance observations.
Markowitz RI; Altes TA; Jaramillo D
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 19411030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
