332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25421231)
1. Propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
Hiraoka A; Totsugawa T; Kuinose M; Nakajima K; Chikazawa G; Tamura K; Yoshitaka H; Sakaguchi T
Circ J; 2014; 78(12):2876-81. PubMed ID: 25421231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic valve replacement via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy: a propensity score analysis.
Glower DD; Desai BS; Hughes GC; Milano CA; Gaca JG
Innovations (Phila); 2014; 9(2):75-81; discussion 81. PubMed ID: 24758951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy: Propensity Matched Initial Experience.
Seitz M; Goldblatt J; Paul E; Marcus T; Larobina M; Yap CH
Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Feb; 28(2):320-326. PubMed ID: 29291961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis.
Ghanta RK; Lapar DJ; Kern JA; Kron IL; Speir AM; Fonner E; Quader M; Ailawadi G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25680751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement.
Hiraoka A; Totsugawa T; Kuinose M; Nakajima K; Chikazawa G; Tamura K; Yoshitaka H; Sakaguchi T
Circ J; 2014 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 25354519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy.
Pineda AM; Santana O; Reyna J; Sarria A; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jan; 22(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23610989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement.
Olds A; Saadat S; Azzolini A; Dombrovskiy V; Odroniec K; Lemaire A; Ghaly A; Lee LY
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 May; 14(1):91. PubMed ID: 31072356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.
Glauber M; Miceli A; Gilmanov D; Ferrarini M; Bevilacqua S; Farneti PA; Solinas M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 May; 145(5):1222-6. PubMed ID: 22516391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes.
Ariyaratnam P; Loubani M; Griffin SC
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Sep; 23(7):814-21. PubMed ID: 25991010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of a minimally invasive approach on reoperative aortic valve replacement.
Gosev I; Neely RC; Leacche M; McGurk S; Kaneko T; Zeljko D; Loberman D; Javed Q; Cohn LH; Aranki SF
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Mar; 24(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 26204682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement.
Stoliński J; Plicner D; Grudzień G; Wąsowicz M; Musiał R; Andres J; Kapelak B
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 152(4):1030-9. PubMed ID: 27449562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined Mitral and Aortic Valve Procedure via Right Mini-Thoracotomy versus Full Median Sternotomy.
Zhao D; Wei L; Zhu S; Zhang Z; Liu H; Yang Y; Wang Y; Ji Q; Wang C
Int Heart J; 2019 Mar; 60(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 30799378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trans-right axillary aortic valve replacement: propensity-matched comparison with standard sternotomy approach.
Tokoro M; Ito T; Maekawa A; Sawaki S; Yanagisawa J; Ozeki T; Orii M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 25(4):521-525. PubMed ID: 28962509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of aortic valve and concomitant ascending aorta replacement performed via a minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach.
LaPietra A; Santana O; Pineda AM; Mihos CG; Lamelas J
Innovations (Phila); 2014; 9(5):339-42; discussion 342. PubMed ID: 25251550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.
Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients.
Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
