These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25421317)

  • 21. Visual selective attention is equally functional for individuals with low and high working memory capacity: evidence from accuracy and eye movements.
    Mall JT; Morey CC; Wolff MJ; Lehnert F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1998-2014. PubMed ID: 24402698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.
    Santangelo V; Finoia P; Raffone A; Belardinelli MO; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 17763843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of working memory load on electrophysiological markers of visuospatial orienting in a spatial cueing task simulating a traffic situation.
    Vossen AY; Ross V; Jongen EM; Ruiter RA; Smulders FT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 26524126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Updating visual-spatial working memory during object movement.
    Boon PJ; Theeuwes J; Belopolsky AV
    Vision Res; 2014 Jan; 94():51-7. PubMed ID: 24262811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fragile visual short-term memory is an object-based and location-specific store.
    Pinto Y; Sligte IG; Shapiro KL; Lamme VA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Aug; 20(4):732-9. PubMed ID: 23456410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual-spatial attention aids the maintenance of object representations in visual working memory.
    Williams M; Pouget P; Boucher L; Woodman GF
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jul; 41(5):698-715. PubMed ID: 23371773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Oculomotor involvement in spatial working memory is task-specific.
    Ball K; Pearson DG; Smith DT
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 24001480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "Life-span development of visual working memory: When is feature binding difficult?": Correction to Cowan et al. (2006).
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Oct; 52(10):1544. PubMed ID: 27690494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition.
    Han SW
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 25192799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No fixed item limit in visuospatial working memory.
    Schneegans S; Bays PM
    Cortex; 2016 Oct; 83():181-93. PubMed ID: 27565636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus.
    Silk TJ; Bellgrove MA; Wrafter P; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):718-24. PubMed ID: 20615473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity.
    Piazza M; Fumarola A; Chinello A; Melcher D
    Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 21679934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual field meridians modulate the reallocation of object-based attention.
    Barnas AJ; Greenberg AS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 27150614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Storage and binding of object features in visual working memory.
    Bays PM; Wu EY; Husain M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1622-31. PubMed ID: 21172364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of attention in retaining the binding of integral features in working memory.
    Wan X; Zhou Y; Wu F; He K; Shen M; Gao Z
    J Vis; 2020 Jul; 20(7):16. PubMed ID: 32687552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach.
    Kyllingsbæk S; Sy JL; Giesbrecht B
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1487-97. PubMed ID: 21145901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Upside-down: Perceived space affects object-based attention.
    Papenmeier F; Meyerhoff HS; Brockhoff A; Jahn G; Huff M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1269-1274. PubMed ID: 28639824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accurate metacognition for visual sensory memory representations.
    Vandenbroucke AR; Sligte IG; Barrett AB; Seth AK; Fahrenfort JJ; Lamme VA
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Apr; 25(4):861-73. PubMed ID: 24549293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.