These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25421408)

  • 1. The self-advantage in visual speech processing enhances audiovisual speech recognition in noise.
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar BP; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1048-53. PubMed ID: 25421408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading your own lips: common-coding theory and visual speech perception.
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar BP; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23132604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lipreading and audiovisual speech recognition across the adult lifespan: Implications for audiovisual integration.
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar B; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers M
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Jun; 31(4):380-9. PubMed ID: 27294718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience with a talker can transfer across modalities to facilitate lipreading.
    Sanchez K; Dias JW; Rosenblum LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1359-65. PubMed ID: 23955059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting Audiovisual Word Recognition in Noisy Situations: Toward Precision Audiology.
    Myerson J; Tye-Murray N; Spehar B; Hale S; Sommers M
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 34320527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased Connectivity among Sensory and Motor Regions during Visual and Audiovisual Speech Perception.
    Peelle JE; Spehar B; Jones MS; McConkey S; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 34815317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audio-visual speech in noise perception in dyslexia.
    van Laarhoven T; Keetels M; Schakel L; Vroomen J
    Dev Sci; 2018 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 27990724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual abilities are important for auditory-only speech recognition: evidence from autism spectrum disorder.
    Schelinski S; Riedel P; von Kriegstein K
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():1-11. PubMed ID: 25283605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers M; Spehar B; Myerson J; Hale S
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 20473178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lip-read me now, hear me better later: cross-modal transfer of talker-familiarity effects.
    Rosenblum LD; Miller RM; Sanchez K
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):392-6. PubMed ID: 17576277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lip-Reading Enables the Brain to Synthesize Auditory Features of Unknown Silent Speech.
    Bourguignon M; Baart M; Kapnoula EC; Molinaro N
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 31889007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence for a self-processing advantage during audiovisual speech integration.
    Treille A; Vilain C; Kandel S; Sato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2867-2876. PubMed ID: 28676921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
    Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inside Speech: Multisensory and Modality-specific Processing of Tongue and Lip Speech Actions.
    Treille A; Vilain C; Hueber T; Lamalle L; Sato M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 29(3):448-466. PubMed ID: 28139959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiovisual speech integration and lipreading in autism.
    Smith EG; Bennetto L
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 48(8):813-21. PubMed ID: 17683453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.