159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25421758)
21. Microbubble-mediated sonoporation for highly efficient transfection of recalcitrant human B- cell lines.
Ling Yong CL; Siak-Wei Ow D; Tandiono T; Mei Heng LL; Kwok-Keung Chan K; Ohl CD; Klaseboer E; Ohl SW; Boon-Hwa Choo A
Biotechnol J; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1081-7. PubMed ID: 24818807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ultrasound‑targeted microbubbles combined with a peptide nucleic acid binding nuclear localization signal mediate transfection of exogenous genes by improving cytoplasmic and nuclear import.
Jiang N; Chen Q; Cao S; Hu B; Wang YJ; Zhou Q; Guo RQ
Mol Med Rep; 2017 Dec; 16(6):8819-8825. PubMed ID: 28990051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A novel approach of low-frequency ultrasonic naked plasmid gene delivery and its assessment.
Wang W; Bian ZZ; Wu YJ; Miao YL
Biomed Environ Sci; 2005 Apr; 18(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 16001827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Metallic micro-ring device for highly efficient large cargo delivery in mammalian cells using infrared light pulses.
Shinde A; Shinde P; Kar S; Illath K; Dey S; Mahapatra NR; Nagai M; Santra TS
Lab Chip; 2023 May; 23(9):2175-2192. PubMed ID: 36928187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of pulse duration, power and energy of fractional Er:YAG laser for transdermal delivery of differently sized FITC dextrans.
Zorec B; Škrabelj D; Marinček M; Miklavčič D; Pavšelj N
Int J Pharm; 2017 Jan; 516(1-2):204-213. PubMed ID: 27818244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microfluidic Electroporation Coupling Pulses of Nanoseconds and Milliseconds to Facilitate Rapid Uptake and Enhanced Expression of DNA in Cell Therapy.
Chang AY; Liu X; Tian H; Hua L; Yang Z; Wang S
Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):6061. PubMed ID: 32269260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Synthesis of (Dex-HMDI)-g-PEIs as effective and low cytotoxic nonviral gene vectors.
Sun YX; Xiao W; Cheng SX; Zhang XZ; Zhuo RX
J Control Release; 2008 Jun; 128(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18439698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison of three different methods in transfection of plasmid pGPU6/GFP/Neo to chicken embryo fibroblasts].
He X; Li H; Shao Y; Hu Y; Gu Z; Chen L; Ma J; Lan Z
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Nov; 42(6):660-5. PubMed ID: 24421233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laser-assisted optoporation of single cells.
Schneckenburger H; Hendinger A; Sailer R; Strauss WS; Schmitt M
J Biomed Opt; 2002 Jul; 7(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 12175291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Shock wave-mediated molecular delivery into cells.
Kodama T; Doukas AG; Hamblin MR
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2002 Jan; 1542(1-3):186-94. PubMed ID: 11853891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomolecule delivery into canola protoplasts by centrifuging cells with microbubbles.
He C; Gu Q; Huang M; Xing J; Chen J
FEBS Lett; 2013 Jan; 587(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 23262220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of photobiomodulation using four diode laser wavelengths of on cationic liposome gene transfection into pre-osteoblast cells.
Hosseinpour S; Xu C; Walsh LJ
J Photochem Photobiol B; 2021 Feb; 215():112108. PubMed ID: 33418241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimal drug and gene delivery in cancer cells by ultrasound-induced cavitation.
Larina IV; Evers BM; Esenaliev RO
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(1A):149-56. PubMed ID: 15816532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Targeted DNA transfection into the mouse central nervous system using laser-induced stress waves.
Satoh Y; Kanda Y; Terakawa M; Obara M; Mizuno K; Watanabe Y; Endo S; Ooigawa H; Nawashiro H; Sato S; Takishima K
J Biomed Opt; 2005; 10(6):060501. PubMed ID: 16409064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro perforation of human epithelial carcinoma cell with antibody-conjugated biodegradable microspheres illuminated by a single 80 femtosecond near-infrared laser pulse.
Terakawa M; Tsunoi Y; Mitsuhashi T
Int J Nanomedicine; 2012; 7():2653-60. PubMed ID: 22679375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electroporation and electrophoretic DNA transfer into cells. The effect of DNA interaction with electropores.
Sukharev SI; Klenchin VA; Serov SM; Chernomordik LV; Chizmadzhev YuA
Biophys J; 1992 Nov; 63(5):1320-7. PubMed ID: 1282374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transfection of HeLa-cells with pEGFP plasmid by impedance power-assisted electroporation.
Glahder J; Norrild B; Persson MB; Persson BR
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Nov; 92(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 16161165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lymphatic Reconnection and Restoration of Lymphatic Flow by Nonvascularized Lymph Node Transplantation: Real-Time Fluorescence Imaging Using Indocyanine Green and Fluorescein Isothiocyanate-Dextran.
Maeda T; Yamamoto Y; Iwasaki D; Hayashi T; Funayama E; Oyama A; Murao N; Furukawa H
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):165-173. PubMed ID: 28956689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analysis of in vitro transfection by sonoporation using cationic and neutral microbubbles.
Tlaxca JL; Anderson CR; Klibanov AL; Lowrey B; Hossack JA; Alexander JS; Lawrence MB; Rychak JJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1907-18. PubMed ID: 20800945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mechanisms of the ultrasound-mediated intracellular delivery of liposomes and dextrans.
Afadzi M; Strand SP; Nilssen EA; Måsøy SE; Johansen TF; Hansen R; Angelsen BA; de L Davies C
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 23287910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
