331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25421934)
1. A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Tan-Kim J; Nager CW; Grimes CL; Luber KM; Lukacz ES; Brown HW; Ferrante KL; Dyer KY; Kirby AC; Menefee SA
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 25421934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomical Outcomes Based on Suturing Technique During Vaginal Mesh Attachment in Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Bazzi AA; Osmundsen BC; Hagglund KH; Aslam MF
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):105-108. PubMed ID: 30807409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and a new approach to mesh fixation: a randomized clinical trial.
Morciano A; Marzo G; Caliandro D; Campagna G; Panico G; Alcaino S; Bisanti T; Ercoli A; Romualdi D; Scambia G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Nov; 298(5):939-944. PubMed ID: 30255345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Matthews CA; Geller EJ; Henley BR; Kenton K; Myers EM; Dieter AA; Parnell B; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG; Wu JM
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):355-364. PubMed ID: 32649494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of one-piece U-shaped mesh and barbed sutures in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
García-Segui A; Lorenzo Soriano L; Costa-Martínez MA; Amorós Torres A; Gilabert A; Oltra MF
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020; 44(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 31806248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of absorbable and permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy: A randomized controlled trial.
Tagliaferri V; Ruggieri S; Taccaliti C; Gentile C; Didonna T; D'asta M; Legge F; Guida P; Scambia G; Guido M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32970837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Using Only Absorbable Suture for Mesh Fixation.
Linder BJ; Anand M; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB; Occhino JA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 27636221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pilot study comparing anatomic failure after sacrocolpopexy with absorbable or permanent sutures for vaginal mesh attachment.
Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA; Lippmann Q; Lukacz ES; Luber KM; Nager CW
Perm J; 2014; 18(4):40-4. PubMed ID: 25662525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Restorelle Y Mesh and Flat Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.
Ferrando CA; Paraiso MFR
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 30807405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: operative times and efficiency in a high-volume female pelvic medicine and laparoscopic surgery practice.
Moore R; Moriarty C; Chinthakanan O; Miklos J
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):887-892. PubMed ID: 27766346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A comprehensive literature review on current practice.
Gluck O; Blaganje M; Veit-Rubin N; Phillips C; Deprest J; O'reilly B; But I; Moore R; Jeffery S; Haddad JM; Deval B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Feb; 245():94-101. PubMed ID: 31891897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy using barbed delayed absorbable sutures.
Borahay MA; Oge T; Walsh TM; Patel PR; Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 24263027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unidirectional barbed sutures as a novel technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Nguyen D; Szomstein S; Ordonez A; Dip F; Rajan M; Menzo EL; Rosenthal RJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):764-769. PubMed ID: 26104792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy Using Barbed Suture Anchoring and Peritoneal Tunneling Technique: Tips and Tricks.
Guan X; Ma Y; Gisseman J; Kleithermes C; Liu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):12-13. PubMed ID: 27344033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Placement of Synthetic Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy.
Nosti PA; Carter CM; Sokol AI; Tefera E; Iglesia CB; Park AJ; Gutman RE
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 26571429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
