These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25421934)

  • 21. A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle® Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes.
    Ferrando CA; Paraiso MFR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 33471144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sacrocolpopexy: is there a consistent surgical technique?
    O'Sullivan OE; Matthews CA; O'Reilly BA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):747-50. PubMed ID: 26564217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair.
    Liu CK; Tsai CP; Chou MM; Shen PS; Chen GD; Hung YC; Hung MJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 25510700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of Robotic Procedural Times Using Colpassist Versus End-to-End Anastomosis Sizer for Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Brueseke T; Matthews C; Willis-Gray M; Knight S; Nieto ML; Geller E
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):e12-e17. PubMed ID: 30807429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of strength of sacrocolpopexy mesh attachment using barbed and nonbarbed sutures.
    Pilkinton ML; Levine GC; Bennett L; Winkler HA; Shalom DF; Finamore PS
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):153-159. PubMed ID: 28980021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Coolen AWM; Bui BN; Dietz V; Wang R; van Montfoort APA; Mol BWJ; Roovers JWR; Bongers MY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1767-1783. PubMed ID: 29038834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does sacrocolpopexy present heterogeneity in its surgical technique? A systematic review.
    Moroni RM; Juliato CRT; Cosson M; Giraudet G; Brito LGO
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Nov; 37(8):2335-2345. PubMed ID: 30024069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology?
    Miklos JR; Moore RD
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abdominal mesh sacrocolpopexy without promontory fixation: initial results of the peritoneocolpopexy technique.
    Lee D; Zimmern PE
    J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2089-93. PubMed ID: 25623750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Reisenauer C; Andress J; Schoenfisch B; Huebner M; Brucker SY; Lippkowski A; Beilecke K; Marschke J; Tunn R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 34100975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.
    To V; Hengrasmee P; Lam A; Luscombe G; Lawless A; Lam J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1825-1832. PubMed ID: 28620794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice].
    Wagner L; Meurette G; Vidart A; Warembourg S; Terassa JB; Berrogain N; Ragni E; Le Normand L
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S27-37. PubMed ID: 27595624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Barbed Versus Nonbarbed Suture for Posterior Colporrhaphy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Merriman AL; Burrell AD; Winn H; Anderson WE; Tarr ME; Myers EM
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2024 Aug; 30(8):721-731. PubMed ID: 38212888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of barbed unidirectional suture with figure-of-eight standard sutures in vaginal cuff closure in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Karacan T; Ozyurek E; Usta T; Odacilar E; Hanli U; Kovalak E; Dayan H
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Aug; 38(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 29577776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Gurshumov E; Lewis C; Priestley JL; Komar J; Shah N; Salamon CG
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jun; 25(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 24264283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique.
    Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
    Sah AP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.