809 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25422824)
1. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up.
Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 25422824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone?
Esposito M; Cannizarro G; Soardi E; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 22282728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
Esposito M; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 25422826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: result at 8 years after loading from a randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(4):385-395. PubMed ID: 30515480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertical bone augmentation versus 7-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial of up to 4 months after loading.
Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Checchi V; Marchetti C; Pellegrino G; Censi P; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 20467615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Soardi E; Corvino V; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 22866291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Di Simone S; Ippolito DR; Felice P
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31116187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Four mm-long versus longer implants in augmented bone in atrophic posterior jaws: 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 27990507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7-mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Felice P; Pellegrino G; Checchi L; Pistilli R; Esposito M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1394-403. PubMed ID: 20678136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants in atrophic maxillae: One-year post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Sammartino G; Grandi G; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 26355170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31116186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6-mm-long 4-mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year post-loading results from a within-person randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Piattelli M; Buti J; Esposito M
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 31116188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Piattelli M; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 29806665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone augmentation versus 5-mm dental implants in posterior atrophic jaws. Four-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Felice P; Checchi V; Pistilli R; Scarano A; Pellegrino G; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(4):267-81. PubMed ID: 20467603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rehabilitation of postrior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial.
Esposito M; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 21594216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
