178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25423700)
1. Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and Pipelle biopsy.
Gungorduk K; Asicioglu O; Ertas IE; Ozdemir IA; Ulker MM; Yildirim G; Ataser G; Sanci M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 25423700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C).
Demirkiran F; Yavuz E; Erenel H; Bese T; Arvas M; Sanioglu C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1277-82. PubMed ID: 22766754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
Kazandi M; Okmen F; Ergenoglu AM; Yeniel AO; Zeybek B; Zekioglu O; Ozdemir N
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
Sanam M; Majid MM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cytospat and pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.
Antoni J; Folch E; Costa J; Foradada CM; Cayuela E; Combalia N; Rué M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1997 Mar; 72(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9076423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is pipelle biopsy really adequate for diagnosing endometrial disease?
Tanriverdi HA; Barut A; Gün BD; Kaya E
Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jun; 10(6):CR271-4. PubMed ID: 15173672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aspiration biopsy versus dilatation and curettage for endometrial hyperplasia prior to hysterectomy.
Hwang WY; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
Diagn Pathol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):7. PubMed ID: 33441173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy.
Liu H; Wang FL; Zhao YM; Yao YQ; Li YL
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 25549755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
Rauf R; Shaheen A; Sadia S; Waqar F; Zafar S; Sultana S; Waseem S
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between pre-operative diagnosis and final pathological diagnosis of endometrial malignancies; impact on primary surgical treatment.
Laban M; Nassar S; Elsayed J; Hassanin AS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Aug; 263():100-105. PubMed ID: 34175583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Abdelazim IA; Aboelezz A; Abdulkareem AF
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24592061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage in clinical practice: are factors affecting their effectiveness the same?
Piatek S; Warzecha D; Kisielewski F; Szymusik I; Panek G; Wielgos M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):645-651. PubMed ID: 30548369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk Factors for Unsuccessful Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy: A Comparative Study of Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy (Pipelle) and Diagnostic Dilation and Curettage.
Xie B; Qian C; Yang B; Ning C; Yao X; Du Y; Shi Y; Luo X; Chen X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):724-729. PubMed ID: 29223698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outpatient endometrial sampling with the Pipelle curette.
Ben-Baruch G; Seidman DS; Schiff E; Moran O; Menczer J
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1994; 37(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 8050731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Different methods for the diagnosis of endometrial histological comparative study].
Leng X; Wang M; Zhang SL; Wang D; Cao W; Yang XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 48(12):891-5. PubMed ID: 24495679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and hysterectomy specimens.
Barut A; Barut F; Arikan I; Harma M; Harma MI; Ozmen Bayar U
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 21917068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Fakhar S; Saeed G; Khan AH; Alam AY
Ann Saudi Med; 2008; 28(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 18500186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effectiveness and Acceptability of Pipelle Endometrial Sampling versus Classical Dilatation and Curettage: A Three-Year Observational Study.
Rezk M; Sayyed T; Dawood R
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(6):537-542. PubMed ID: 26928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of the Efficacy of Pipelle Biopsy Technique to Diagnose Endometrial Diseases in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.
Ilavarasi CR; Jyothi GS; Alva NK
J Midlife Health; 2019; 10(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 31391756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
