BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25423894)

  • 1. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey.
    Akl EA; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Johnston BC; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramírez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabria AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Vernooij RW; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009368. PubMed ID: 26423858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 4():98. PubMed ID: 26202162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA
    BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three challenges described for identifying participants with missing data in trials reports, and potential solutions suggested to systematic reviewers.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Ebrahim S; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():147-54. PubMed ID: 26944294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide.
    Akl EA; Shawwa K; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008431. PubMed ID: 26719310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Hooft L; Guyatt GH; Scholten RJPM; Akl EA
    Clin Epidemiol; 2020; 12():527-535. PubMed ID: 32547244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Agarwal A; Mustafa RA; Kwong J; Neumann I; Li L; Lopes LC; Briel M; Busse JW; Iorio A; Vandvik PO; Alexander PE; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():14-23. PubMed ID: 29505859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches for rapid reviews: protocol of a non-inferiority and meta-epidemiologic study.
    Nussbaumer-Streit B; Klerings I; Wagner G; Titscher V; Gartlehner G
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):197. PubMed ID: 27876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An empirical investigation of the potential impact of selective inclusion of results in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Green SE; Forbes AB
    Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; 2():21. PubMed ID: 23575367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.
    Hansen JB; Juhl CB; Boutron I; Tugwell P; Ghogomu EAT; Pardo Pardo J; Rader T; Wells GA; Mayhew A; Maxwell L; Lund H; Christensen R;
    BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e005491. PubMed ID: 25280805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potentially missing data are considerably more frequent than definitely missing data: a methodological survey of 638 randomized controlled trials.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Khamis AM; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():18-31. PubMed ID: 30300676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Addressing dichotomous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.
    Akl EA; Johnston BC; Alonso-Coello P; Neumann I; Ebrahim S; Briel M; Cook DJ; Guyatt GH
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57132. PubMed ID: 23451162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drugs commonly associated with weight change: umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis (Protocol).
    Domecq JP; Prutsky G; Wang Z; Elraiyah T; Brito JP; Mauck K; Lababidi MH; Leppin A; Fidahussein S; Prokop LJ; Montori VM; Murad MH
    Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; 1():44. PubMed ID: 23020969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.
    Ebrahim S; Akl EA; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Alonso-Coello P; Johnston BC; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1014-1021.e1. PubMed ID: 23774111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang Y; Flórez ID; Colunga Lozano LE; Aloweni FAB; Kennedy SA; Li A; Craigie S; Zhang S; Agarwal A; Lopes LC; Devji T; Wiercioch W; Riva JJ; Wang M; Jin X; Fei Y; Alexander P; Morgano GP; Zhang Y; Carrasco-Labra A; Kahale LA; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():57-66. PubMed ID: 28583378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.