265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25424158)
1. Intramedullary nailing of femoral diaphyseal metastases: is it necessary to protect the femoral neck?
Moon B; Lin P; Satcher R; Bird J; Lewis V
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1499-502. PubMed ID: 25424158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is It Appropriate to Treat Sarcoma Metastases With Intramedullary Nailing?
Moon BS; Dunbar DJ; Lin PP; Satcher RL; Bird JE; Lewis VO
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):212-217. PubMed ID: 27804017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is a Cephalomedullary Nail Durable Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Peritrochanteric Disease?
Chafey DH; Lewis VO; Satcher RL; Moon BS; Lin PP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2392-2401. PubMed ID: 30299285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?
Peterson JR; Decilveo AP; O'Connor IT; Golub I; Wittig JC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):745-756. PubMed ID: 27052019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Intramedullary fixation in (impending) femur fractures caused by tumor metastases].
van Doorn R; van der Hulst RR; van den Wildenberg FA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Oct; 138(42):2101-5. PubMed ID: 7969577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CORR Insights ®: Intramedullary nailing of femoral diaphyseal metastases: is it necessary to protect the femoral neck?
Scarborough MT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1503-4. PubMed ID: 25537809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Intramedullary nailing for treatment of pathologic femoral fractures due to metastases.
Piccioli A; Rossi B; Scaramuzzo L; Spinelli MS; Yang Z; Maccauro G
Injury; 2014 Feb; 45(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 24119652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Factors Are Associated With Implant Breakage and Revision After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Metastases?
Willeumier JJ; Kaynak M; van der Zwaal P; Meylaerts SAG; Mathijssen NMC; Jutte PC; Tsagozis P; Wedin R; van de Sande MAJ; Fiocco M; Dijkstra PDS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Sep; 476(9):1823-1833. PubMed ID: 30566108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Venting during prophylactic nailing for femoral metastases: current orthopedic practice.
Dalgorf D; Borkhoff CM; Stephen DJ; Finkelstein J; Kreder HJ
Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 14680349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intramedullary nailing without curettage and cement augmentation for the treatment of impending and complete pathological fractures of the proximal or midshaft femur.
Shemesh S; Kosashvili Y; Sidon E; Yaari L; Cohen N; Velkes S
Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Mar; 80(1):144-50. PubMed ID: 24873100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What Factors Are Associated With Local Metastatic Lesion Progression After Intramedullary Nail Stabilization?
Arpornsuksant P; Morris CD; Forsberg JA; Levin AS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 May; 480(5):932-945. PubMed ID: 34962492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Not All Patients Undergoing Stabilization of Impending Pathologic Fractures for Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases to the Femur Need Preoperative Embolization.
Jernigan EW; Tennant JN; Esther RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Mar; 476(3):529-534. PubMed ID: 29529636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prophylactic stabilization for bone metastases, myeloma, or lymphoma: do we need to protect the entire bone?
Alvi HM; Damron TA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Mar; 471(3):706-14. PubMed ID: 23104043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prophylactic internal fixation of the femur for neoplastic lesions.
Ryan JR; Rowe DE; Salciccioli GG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1976 Dec; 58(8):1071-4. PubMed ID: 1002747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intramedullary nailing has sufficient durability for metastatic femoral fractures.
Tanaka T; Imanishi J; Charoenlap C; Choong PF
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 14():80. PubMed ID: 26966046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is reconstruction nailing of all femoral shaft fractures cost effective? A decision analysis.
Faucett SC; Collinge CA; Koval KJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Nov; 26(11):624-32. PubMed ID: 22487902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral recon nails for metastatic disease: indications, technique, and results.
Ward WG; Spang J; Howe D; Gordan S
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2000 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):34-42. PubMed ID: 11011778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prophylactic femoral stabilization with the Zickel nail by closed technique.
Sangeorzan BJ; Ryan JR; Salciccioli GG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Sep; 68(7):991-9. PubMed ID: 3745262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures combined with neck or distal femur fractures. A retrospective review of 25 cases, with a follow-up of 36-150 months.
Okcu G; Aktuglu K
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Dec; 123(10):544-50. PubMed ID: 13680274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions.
Damron TA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Brown C; Grant W; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Terek RM; Anderson ME; Cheng EY; Aboulafia AJ; Gebhardt MC; Snyder BD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 26169800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
