These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25424583)

  • 1. Uncertainty beyond sampling error.
    Altman DG; Bland JM
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g7065. PubMed ID: 25424583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty and sampling error.
    Altman DG; Bland JM
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g7064. PubMed ID: 25424395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Points of significance: error bars.
    Krzywinski M; Altman N
    Nat Methods; 2013 Oct; 10(10):921-2. PubMed ID: 24161969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of sampling error and measurement error and its correlation on the estimation of multi-locus fixed-bin VNTR RFLP genotype probabilities.
    Hartmann JM; Houlihan BT; Thompson LD; Chan C; Baldwin RA; Buse EL
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 9068182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of sampling error and standard error.
    Sedgwick P
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3577. PubMed ID: 26141598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic sampling: theory and clinical methods.
    Floyd JA
    Nurs Res; 1993; 42(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 8415044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation from samples.
    Sullivan LM
    Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 16880342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Assumption of maximal indetermination: an absolute error or a relative error in calculation of sample size?].
    Marrugat J; Vila J; Pavesi M
    Gac Sanit; 1999; 13(6):491. PubMed ID: 10733336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Basic program to compute the exact confidence interval of the SMR when the reference population's parameter is subjected to sampling error.
    Lee J
    J Occup Environ Med; 1995 Apr; 37(4):416-7. PubMed ID: 7670896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The problem of model selection uncertainty in structural equation modeling.
    Preacher KJ; Merkle EC
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 22268762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring coverage in MNCH: total survey error and the interpretation of intervention coverage estimates from household surveys.
    Eisele TP; Rhoda DA; Cutts FT; Keating J; Ren R; Barros AJ; Arnold F
    PLoS Med; 2013; 10(5):e1001386. PubMed ID: 23667331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Secondary analysis: theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations.
    Clarke SP; Cossette S
    Can J Nurs Res; 2000 Dec; 32(3):109-29. PubMed ID: 11928128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for constructing a confidence bound for the actual error rate of a prediction rule in high dimensions.
    Dobbin KK
    Biostatistics; 2009 Apr; 10(2):282-96. PubMed ID: 19039030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel approach to quantify random error explicitly in epidemiological studies.
    Janszky I; Bjørngaard JH; Romundstad P; Vatten L
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):899-902. PubMed ID: 21805167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making inferences from data.
    Hagen S
    NT Learn Curve; 1998 Nov; 2(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 10076328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting for selection bias in assessing treatment effect estimates from multiple subgroups.
    Glimm E
    Biom J; 2019 Jan; 61(1):216-229. PubMed ID: 30474240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resampling: a good tool, no panacea.
    Davis RB
    MD Comput; 1995; 12(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 7700128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The uncertainty associated with the predictive value of test results.
    Malvano R; Chiecchio A; Borsa M; Messeri G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 36(7):463-8. PubMed ID: 9746271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis.
    Wedenberg M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model confidence bounds for variable selection.
    Li Y; Luo Y; Ferrari D; Hu X; Qin Y
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 30648746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.