162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25424853)
1. Interobserver agreement in describing the ultrasound appearance of adnexal masses and in calculating the risk of malignancy using logistic regression models.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Feb; 21(3):594-601. PubMed ID: 25424853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular network assessment of adnexal masses: intraobserver and interobserver agreement analysis.
Alcázar JL; Cabrera C; Galván R; Guerriero S
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):997-1001. PubMed ID: 18577662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Sanchez P; Pineda L; Utrilla-Layna J; Juez L; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 24265132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of assessment of Doppler ultrasound findings in adnexal masses.
Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 42(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 23065868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective validation of the IOTA logistic regression models (LR1 and LR2) in comparison to subjective pattern recognition for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Hoo WL; Naftalin J; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1583-9. PubMed ID: 24088790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The diagnosis of ovarian cancer: is color Doppler imaging reproducible and accurate in examiners with different degrees of experience?
Guerriero S; Alcazar JL; Pascual MA; Ajossa S; Graupera B; Hereter L; Melis GB
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Feb; 20(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 21265646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of ultrasound pattern recognition by expert operators to identify borderline ovarian tumors: a study of diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement.
Yazbek J; Ameye L; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Valentin L; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 19746450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of adnexal masses: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of videos, using IOTA terminology.
Massobrio R; Mariani LL; Conti D; De Grandis T; Buonomo F; Badellino E; Novara L; Bounous VE; Perotto S; Mancarella M; Ferrero A; Biglia N; Fuso L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; 309(1):211-218. PubMed ID: 37789207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology.
Ameye L; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Paladini D; Zhang J; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Savelli L; Veldman J; Testa AC; Amant F; Van Huffel S; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 22511559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
