These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25425203)

  • 1. Effects of mental footnotes on the trajectory movement in a driving simulation task.
    Vilchez JL
    J Mot Behav; 2015; 47(3):211-25. PubMed ID: 25425203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in a selective reaching task.
    Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 21507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 19750791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The site of interference in the saccadic Stroop effect.
    Hermens F; Walker R
    Vision Res; 2012 Nov; 73():10-22. PubMed ID: 23026013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional.
    Jonikaitis D; Schubert T; Deubel H
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):23. PubMed ID: 21172898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on visually guided hand movements.
    Lee D
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 8(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 10407203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional networks functioning, age, and attentional lapses while driving.
    López-Ramón MF; Castro C; Roca J; Ledesma R; Lupiañez J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):518-28. PubMed ID: 21972863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alpha spindles as neurophysiological correlates indicating attentional shift in a simulated driving task.
    Sonnleitner A; Simon M; Kincses WE; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 22094045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.
    Irving EL; Tajik-Parvinchi DJ; Lillakas L; González EG; Steinbach MJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():67-74. PubMed ID: 19103183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
    Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: insight from movement trajectory deviations.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 22133725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Slip Induction Task: creating a window into cognitive control failures.
    Clark AJ; Parakh R; Smilek D; Roy EA
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):558-74. PubMed ID: 21994182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-state modulation of the contextual cueing effect: Evidence from eye movement recordings.
    Zhao G; Liu Q; Jiao J; Zhou P; Li H; Sun HJ
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):11. PubMed ID: 22685338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saccade preparation is required for exogenous attention but not endogenous attention or IOR.
    Smith DT; Schenk T; Rorden C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1438-47. PubMed ID: 22428677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinesthesia in a sustained-attention driving task.
    Chuang CH; Ko LW; Jung TP; Lin CT
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():187-202. PubMed ID: 24444995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paying attention to saccadic intrusions.
    Gowen E; Abadi RV; Poliakoff E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):810-25. PubMed ID: 16256318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do the early attentional components of ERPs reflect attentional bias in depression? It depends on the stimulus presentation time.
    Mingtian Z; Xiongzhao Z; Jinyao Y; Shuqiao Y; Atchley RA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jul; 122(7):1371-81. PubMed ID: 20961804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.