These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2542536)

  • 1. Effect of a hydraulic jet prophylaxis system on composites.
    Reel DC; Abrams H; Gardner SL; Mitchell RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 2542536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface alterations on dental restorative materials subjected to an air-powder abrasive instrument.
    Eliades GC; Tzoutzas JG; Vougiouklakis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1827842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of prophylaxis method on microtensile bond strength of indirect restorations to dentin.
    Soares CJ; Pereira JC; Souza SJ; Menezes MS; Armstrong SR
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 22616925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship of weight loss to surface roughness of composite resins from simulated toothbrushing.
    Kanter J; Koski RE; Martin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 May; 47(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 6211543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Localized three-body wear of resin composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():19-27. PubMed ID: 8935090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of enamel preparation on the tensile bond strength of orthodontic composite resin.
    Gerbo LR; Lacefield WR; Wells BR; Russell CM
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(4):275-81; discussion 282. PubMed ID: 1333734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of an air-powder abrasive instrument on composite resin.
    Cooley RL; Lubow RM; Patrissi GA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Mar; 112(3):362-4. PubMed ID: 2937824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of composite resin filler particles by using scanning electron microscopy and digital imaging.
    Jaarda MJ; Lang BR; Wang RF; Edwards CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 8463973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites.
    Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 7803009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of abrasive particle size and contact stress on the wear rate of dental restorative materials.
    Harrison A; Moores GE
    Dent Mater; 1985 Feb; 1(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 3160626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of dental resin composites based on micron- and submicron-sized monomodal glass filler particles.
    Valente LL; Peralta SL; Ogliari FA; Cavalcante LM; Moraes RR
    Dent Mater; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1182-7. PubMed ID: 24095108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the filler packing structures in dental resin composites: From theory to practice.
    Wang R; Habib E; Zhu XX
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jul; 34(7):1014-1023. PubMed ID: 29673709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Surface characteristics of dental enamel, root cementum, and dentin after ultrasound treatment and after jet-spray of a water-sodium bicarbonate mixture].
    Topoll H; Horvath G; Lange DE
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Jul; 40(7):755-8. PubMed ID: 3007074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-dependent deformation of composite restorative materials in compression.
    Cock DJ; Watts DC
    J Dent Res; 1985 Feb; 64(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 3156163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the effects of two different prophylaxis regimes in vitro on some restorative dental materials. A preliminary SEM study.
    Patterson CJ; McLundie AC
    Br Dent J; 1984 Sep; 157(5):166-70. PubMed ID: 6593083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of air polishing on the abrasion of occlusal sealants.
    Huennekens SC; Daniel SJ; Bayne SC
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jul; 22(7):581-5. PubMed ID: 1831911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Modes of use and clinical applications of an apparatus with a sodium bicarbonate jet].
    Salvato A; Farronato GP; Cristina R
    Dent Cadmos; 1983 Aug; 51(8):35-40. PubMed ID: 6088306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Particle and Air-Abrasion Moment on Y-TZP Surface Characterization and Bond Strength.
    Martins SB; Abi-Rached FO; Adabo GL; Baldissara P; Fonseca RG
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e271-e278. PubMed ID: 29235196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.