101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25425488)
1. Determining the flow regime in a biofilm carrier by means of magnetic resonance imaging.
Herrling MP; Guthausen G; Wagner M; Lackner S; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2015 May; 112(5):1023-32. PubMed ID: 25425488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Online assessment of biofilm development, sloughing and forced detachment in tube reactor by means of magnetic resonance microscopy.
Wagner M; Manz B; Volke F; Neu TR; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Sep; 107(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 20506514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring local flow velocities and biofilm structure in biofilm systems with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Manz B; Volke F; Goll D; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Nov; 84(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 14574699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring the formation of an Aureobasidium pullulans biofilm in a bead-packed reactor via flow-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Metzger U; Lankes U; Hardy EH; Gordalla BC; Frimmel FH
Biotechnol Lett; 2006 Aug; 28(16):1305-11. PubMed ID: 16802094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance microscopy analysis of advective transport in a biofilm reactor.
Gjersing EL; Codd SL; Seymour JD; Stewart PS
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(7):822-34. PubMed ID: 15696510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nitrifying moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) biofilm and biomass response to long term exposure to 1 °C.
Hoang V; Delatolla R; Abujamel T; Mottawea W; Gadbois A; Laflamme E; Stintzi A
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():215-24. PubMed ID: 24333509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating biofilm structure developing on carriers from lab-scale moving bed biofilm reactors based on light microscopy and optical coherence tomography.
Li C; Felz S; Wagner M; Lackner S; Horn H
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jan; 200():128-36. PubMed ID: 26476614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anammox enrichment from reject water on blank biofilm carriers and carriers containing nitrifying biomass: operation of two moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR).
Zekker I; Rikmann E; Tenno T; Lemmiksoo V; Menert A; Loorits L; Vabamäe P; Tomingas M; Tenno T
Biodegradation; 2012 Jul; 23(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 22311588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of MBBR carrier geometrical properties and biofilm thickness restraint on biofilm properties, effluent particle size distribution, settling velocity distribution, and settling behaviour.
Arabgol R; Vanrolleghem PA; Delatolla R
J Environ Sci (China); 2022 Dec; 122():138-149. PubMed ID: 35717079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling clogging and biofilm detachment in sponge carrier media.
So M; Naka D; Goel R; Terashima M; Yasui H
Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(6):1298-303. PubMed ID: 24647197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating the most appropriate methods for attached solids determination in moving-bed biofilm reactors.
Fonseca DL; Bassin JP
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2019 Nov; 42(11):1867-1878. PubMed ID: 31375964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of operational conditions on biofilm specific activity of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor.
García-Morales JL; Romero LI; Sales D
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):197-200. PubMed ID: 12701928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural features of biomass in a hybrid MBBR reactor.
Xiao GY; Ganczarczyk J
Environ Technol; 2006 Mar; 27(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 16548209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Organic removal activity in biofilm and suspended biomass fractions of MBBR systems.
Piculell M; Welander T; Jönsson K
Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 24434968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short and long term biosorption of silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles in heterotrophic biofilms.
Herrling MP; Lackner S; Tatti O; Guthausen G; Delay M; Franzreb M; Horn H
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Feb; 544():722-9. PubMed ID: 26674701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biofilm loss in anaerobic immobilized fixed bed reactor system.
Nandy T; Kaul SN
Environ Technol; 2002 Apr; 23(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 12088368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Formation and growth of heterotrophic aerobic biofilms on small suspended particles in airlift reactors.
Tijhuis L; van Loosdrecht MC; Heijnen JJ
Biotechnol Bioeng; 1994 Aug; 44(5):595-608. PubMed ID: 18618795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detachment of biomass from suspended nongrowing spherical biofilms in airlift reactors.
Gjaltema A; Tijhuis L; van Loosdrecht MC; Heijnen JJ
Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 May; 46(3):258-69. PubMed ID: 18623310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interaction between local hydrodynamics and algal community in epilithic biofilm.
Graba M; Sauvage S; Moulin FY; Urrea G; Sabater S; Sanchez-Pérez JM
Water Res; 2013 May; 47(7):2153-63. PubMed ID: 23466033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design optimization of a self-cleaning moving-bed bioreactor for seawater denitrification.
Dupla M; Comeau Y; Parent S; Villemur R; Jolicoeur M
Water Res; 2006 Jan; 40(2):249-58. PubMed ID: 16343585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
