994 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25425897)
1. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
Mueller HG
Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
Kim H; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
Putterman DB; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Souza PE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):118-124. PubMed ID: 29401059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response.
Westwood GF; Bamford JM
Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 7672475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chapter 4: Introduction and Getting Ready for Real-Ear Probe Microphone Measures.
Zitelli L; Palmer C
Semin Hear; 2024 May; 45(2):205-215. PubMed ID: 38855348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.
McCreery RW; Bentler RA; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 23575463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of a miniature microphone in the ear canal for the verification of hearing aid performance.
Harford ER
Ear Hear; 1980; 1(6):329-37. PubMed ID: 7439566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of an in-situ output probe-microphone method for hearing aid fitting verification.
Cox RM; Alexander GC
Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2307301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
De Sousa KC; Manchaiah V; Moore DR; Graham MA; Swanepoel W
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jun; 149(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 37052929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probe tube systems: effects of equalization on real ear insertion and aided gain.
Moskal NL; Goldstein DP
Ear Hear; 1992 Feb; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 1541373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical measures of hearing aid directivity: assumption, accuracy, and reliability.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 21826003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum.
Chung K
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 23403807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit.
Narayanan SE; Manjula P
Codas; 2021; 34(1):e20200310. PubMed ID: 34669764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.
Mueller HG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 16295232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
