132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25426428)
1. An Undecimated Wavelet-based Method for Cochlear Implant Speech Processing.
Hajiaghababa F; Kermani S; Marateb HR
J Med Signals Sens; 2014 Oct; 4(4):247-55. PubMed ID: 25426428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The design and validation of a hybrid digital-signal-processing plug-in for traditional cochlear implant speech processors.
Hajiaghababa F; Marateb HR; Kermani S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():103-109. PubMed ID: 29650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech enhancement via two-stage dual tree complex wavelet packet transform with a speech presence probability estimator.
Sun P; Qin J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):808. PubMed ID: 28253659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech processing for cochlear implants with the discrete wavelet transform: feasibility study and performance evaluation.
Paglialonga A; Tognola G; Baselli G; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Grandori F
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():3763-6. PubMed ID: 17946580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The application of bionic wavelet transform to speech signal processing in cochlear implants using neural network simulations.
Yao J; Zhang YT
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1299-309. PubMed ID: 12450360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The undecimated wavelet decomposition and its reconstruction.
Starck JL; Fadili J; Murtagh F
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2007 Feb; 16(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 17269625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A recursive wavelet-based strategy for real-time cochlear implant speech processing on PDA platforms.
Gopalakrishna V; Kehtarnavaz N; Loizou PC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Aug; 57(8):2053-63. PubMed ID: 20403778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of wavelet in speech processing of cochlear implant.
Tian G; Shuli Y; Datian Y
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2005; 2005():5339-42. PubMed ID: 17281457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
Kasturi K; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving Speech Recognition in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users by Listening With the Better Ear.
Kan A
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518772963. PubMed ID: 29708063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of cochlear implant n-of-m strategy on signal-to-noise ratio below which noise hinders speech recognition.
Stam L; Goverts ST; Smits C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):EL417. PubMed ID: 31153330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise reduction in ultrasonic NDT using undecimated wavelet transforms.
Pardo E; San Emeterio JL; Rodriguez MA; Ramos A
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e1063-7. PubMed ID: 16797651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
