BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25426662)

  • 61. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Self-reported benefit, sound perception, and quality-of-life in patients with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs).
    Lundin K; Stillesjö F; Nyberg G; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2016; 136(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26426855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Balancing current levels in children with bilateral cochlear implants using electrophysiological and behavioral measures.
    Gordon KA; Abbasalipour P; Papsin BC
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():193-206. PubMed ID: 27021590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Electrically evoked brainstem responses in cochlear implant recipients.
    Miyamoto RT; Brown DD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Jan; 96(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 3118294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs)--20 years of clinical experience in Uppsala, Sweden.
    Siegbahn M; Lundin K; Olsson GB; Stillesjö F; Kinnefors A; Rask-Andersen H; Nyberg G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 134(10):1052-61. PubMed ID: 24881643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees.
    Raghunandhan S; Ravikumar A; Kameswaran M; Mandke K; Ranjith R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):145-60. PubMed ID: 24606544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use.
    Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ; Don M; Waring MD; Kwong B; Cunningham J; Trautwein P
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):167-85. PubMed ID: 10859411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Early surgical results of auditory brainstem implantation in nontumor patients.
    Choi JY; Song MH; Jeon JH; Lee WS; Chang JW
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Dec; 121(12):2610-8. PubMed ID: 22109761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Sensorial substitution using sound-vibratory stimuli on the teeth: a new approach to the rehabilitation of the profoundly deaf.
    Galera-García C; Nombela-Gomez M
    Int J Neurosci; 1989 Nov; 49(1-2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2606607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Auditory brain stem responses and cortical auditory-evoked potentials in difficult-to-test children.
    Robier A; Lemaire MC; Garreau B; Ployet MJ; Martineau J; Delvert JC; Reynaud J
    Audiology; 1983; 22(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 6870664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Calcinosis cutis following calcium chloride electrode paste application for auditory-brainstem evoked potentials recording.
    Puig L; Rocamora V; Romaní J; Saavedra M; Alomar A
    Pediatr Dermatol; 1998; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9496799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The "Four Corners" Method of Auditory Brainstem Implant Placement.
    Avillion M; Dzubak D; Olszewski A; Slattery W; Lekovic G
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jul; 45(6):e499. PubMed ID: 38865731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Wavelets--new method of evoked potential analysis.
    Bartnik EA; Blinowska KJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1992 Jan; 30(1):125-6. PubMed ID: 1640748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Auditory perception of rhyming in kindergarten children.
    Knafle JD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1973 Sep; 16(3):482-7. PubMed ID: 4744966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection.
    He S; McFayden TC; Teagle HF; Ewend M; Henderson L; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):634-649. PubMed ID: 27579988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tavora-Vieira D; Ffoulkes E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):294-307. PubMed ID: 36958296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implantation: Surgical, Electrophysiologic, and Behavioral Outcomes.
    Teagle HFB; Henderson L; He S; Ewend MG; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):326-336. PubMed ID: 29023243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
    He S; McFayden TC; Shahsavarani BS; Teagle HFB; Ewend M; Henderson L; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):482-494. PubMed ID: 28968281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.