234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25426723)
1. Social and natural sciences differ in their research strategies, adapted to work for different knowledge landscapes.
Jaffe K
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113901. PubMed ID: 25426723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.
Massarrat S; Kolahdoozan S
Arch Iran Med; 2011 Nov; 14(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22039839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural and Social Sciences - Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater Research.
Barthel R; Seidl R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170754. PubMed ID: 28129352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-edged sword of interdisciplinary knowledge flow from hard sciences to humanities and social sciences: Evidence from China.
Liu M; Shi D; Li J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184977. PubMed ID: 28934277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Significance of journal articles within the scientific literature of various disciplines: trends over the past two decades].
Schubert A; Soós S
Orv Hetil; 2015 Jun; 156(24):985-7. PubMed ID: 26051135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research thrives on integration of natural and social sciences.
Fisher E; Biggs S; Lindsay S; Zhao J
Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7284):1018. PubMed ID: 20182491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The divided communities of shared concerns: mapping the intellectual structure of e-Health research in social science journals.
Jiang LC; Wang ZZ; Peng TQ; Zhu JJ
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jan; 84(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 25277295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and update of a classification system: the UCSD map of science.
Börner K; Klavans R; Patek M; Zoss AM; Biberstine JR; Light RP; Larivière V; Boyack KW
PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e39464. PubMed ID: 22808037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speaking across boundaries to explore the potential for interdisciplinarity in ecosystem services knowledge production.
Schutter MS; Hicks CC
Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1198-1209. PubMed ID: 33084137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rising slopes-Bibliometrics of mountain research 1900-2019.
Gurgiser W; Price MF; Juen IF; Körner C; Bahn M; Gems B; Meyer M; Nicolussi K; Tappeiner U; Mayr S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273421. PubMed ID: 36007003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature.
Lamers WS; Boyack K; Larivière V; Sugimoto CR; van Eck NJ; Waltman L; Murray D
Elife; 2021 Dec; 10():. PubMed ID: 34951588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can biosemiotics be a "science" if its purpose is to be a bridge between the natural, social and human sciences?
Brier S
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2015 Dec; 119(3):576-87. PubMed ID: 26260778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the bibliometric coordinates of four different research fields in Geography.
Gorraiz J; Gumpenberger C; Glade T
Scientometrics; 2016; 107():873-897. PubMed ID: 27122649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history.
Baneyx A
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(6):363-71. PubMed ID: 19043670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which articles and which topics in the forensic sciences are most highly cited?
Jones AW
Sci Justice; 2005; 45(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 16686268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].
Donato HM; De Oliveira CF
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 17234084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science.
Bollen J; Van de Sompel H; Hagberg A; Bettencourt L; Chute R; Rodriguez MA; Balakireva L
PLoS One; 2009; 4(3):e4803. PubMed ID: 19277205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Apples with oranges? Comparison of scientometric indicators between fields].
Schubert A
Orv Hetil; 2016 Apr; 157(16):631-4. PubMed ID: 27063431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the relationship between the engineering and physical sciences and the health and life sciences by advanced bibliometric methods.
Waltman L; van Raan AF; Smart S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111530. PubMed ID: 25360616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reflections on the disciplinary gulf between the natural and social sciences.
Wright S
Community Genet; 2006; 9(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 16741345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
