These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25428652)

  • 1. Effect of physical property of supporting media and variable hydraulic loading on hydraulic characteristics of advanced onsite wastewater treatment system.
    Sharma MK; Kazmi AA
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(9-12):1414-22. PubMed ID: 25428652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified septic tank-anaerobic filter unit as a two-stage onsite domestic wastewater treatment system.
    Sharma MK; Khursheed A; Kazmi AA
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(17-20):2183-93. PubMed ID: 25145171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydraulic characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor as onsite wastewater treatment system.
    Sarathai Y; Koottatep T; Morel A
    J Environ Sci (China); 2010; 22(9):1319-26. PubMed ID: 21174961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of high hydraulic loading rate on the removal efficiency of a quadruple media filter for tertiary wastewater treatment.
    Ncube P; Pidou M; Stephenson T; Jefferson B; Jarvis P
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 107():102-112. PubMed ID: 27837728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximizing total nitrogen removal from onsite-generated wastewater.
    Safferman SI; Novellino MI; Burks BD; Parker RA
    J Environ Health; 2006; 68(6):25-32. PubMed ID: 16483082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term phosphorus sorption and leaching in sand filters for onsite treatment systems.
    Hamisi R; Renman A; Renman G; Wörman A; Thunvik R
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 833():155254. PubMed ID: 35429567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient nitrogen removal from onsite wastewater by a novel continuous flow biofilter.
    Chen S; Wang M; Russo FM; Gobler CJ; Mao X
    Chemosphere; 2022 Aug; 300():134642. PubMed ID: 35439482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vertical flow constructed wetland planted with Heliconia psittacorum used as decentralized post-treatment of anaerobic effluent in Southern Brazil.
    Decezaro ST; Wolff DB; Araújo RK; Faccenda HB; Perondi T; Sezerino PH
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2018; 53(13):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 30596356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study on the effects of different hydraulic loading rates (HLR) on pollutant removal efficiency of subsurface horizontal-flow constructed wetlands used for treatment of domestic wastewaters.
    Çakir R; Gidirislioglu A; Çebi U
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Dec; 164():121-8. PubMed ID: 26363259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Purification Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Combined Bio-filters for Aquaculture Wastewater].
    Zhang SY; Zhang SH; Zhang XL; Wang GJ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2017 Jun; 38(6):2419-2428. PubMed ID: 29965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative performance of UASB and anaerobic hybrid reactors for the treatment of complex phenolic wastewater.
    Ramakrishnan A; Surampalli RY
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Nov; 123():352-9. PubMed ID: 22940341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of hydraulic separation in a novel anaerobic-anoxic upflow reactor for biological nutrient removal.
    Díez-Montero R; De Florio L; González-Viar M; Volcke EI; Tejero I
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2015 Jan; 38(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 25001422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of semi-batch vs. continuously fed anaerobic bioreactors for the treatment of a high-strength, solids-rich pumpkin-processing wastewater.
    del Agua I; Usack JG; Angenent LT
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(13-16):1974-83. PubMed ID: 25683478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling hydraulic transport and anaerobic uptake by PAOs and GAOs during wastewater feeding in EBPR granular sludge reactors.
    Weissbrodt DG; Holliger C; Morgenroth E
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2017 Aug; 114(8):1688-1702. PubMed ID: 28322436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance evaluation of anaerobic hybrid reactors with different packing media for treating wastewater of mild alkali treated rice straw in ethanol fermentation process.
    Narra M; Balasubramanian V; Mehta H; Dixit G; Madamwar D; Shah AR
    Bioresour Technol; 2014; 152():59-65. PubMed ID: 24291309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of an anaerobic filter packed with a low-cost material for treating domestic wastewater.
    López-López A; Albarrán-Rivas MG; Hernández-Mena L; León-Becerril E
    Environ Technol; 2013; 34(9-12):1151-9. PubMed ID: 24191447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Domestic wastewater treatment efficiency of the pilot-scale trickling biofilter system with variable flow rates and hydraulic retention times.
    Rehman A; Ali H; Naz I; Saroj DP; Ahmed S
    Environ Technol; 2021 Feb; 42(6):972-983. PubMed ID: 31397214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calibration of hydrodynamic behavior and biokinetics for TOC removal modeling in biofilm reactors under different hydraulic conditions.
    Zeng M; Soric A; Roche N
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():202-9. PubMed ID: 23871921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wastewater reuse in on-site wastewater treatment: bacteria and virus movement in unsaturated flow through sand filter.
    Sélas B; Lakel A; Andres Y; Le Cloirec P
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 12578174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.