These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25428901)

  • 1. A systematic review of questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction with limb orthoses.
    Bettoni E; Ferriero G; Bakhsh H; Bravini E; Massazza G; Franchignoni F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 25428901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification and analysis of knee-ankle-foot orthosis design requirements based on a feedback survey of orthosis users in India.
    Bapat GM; Sujatha S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29265890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Italian version of the Client Satisfaction with Device module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
    Bravini E; Franchignoni F; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Bakhsh H; Sartorio F; Vercelli S
    Disabil Health J; 2014 Oct; 7(4):442-7. PubMed ID: 25224984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Translation into Arabic of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology 2.0 and validation in orthosis users.
    Bakhsh H; Franchignoni F; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Demers L
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Dec; 37(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 25305007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Arabic version of the client satisfaction with device module of the orthotics and prosthetics users survey.
    Bakhsh H; Franchignoni F; Bravini E; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Foti C
    Ann Saudi Med; 2014; 34(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 25811205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric properties of the Client Satisfaction with Device module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a scoping review.
    Sorrentino G; Vercelli S; Salgovic L; Ronconi G; Bakhsh HR; Ferriero G
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2021 Sep; 44(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 34356037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of client experiences with orthotics using the QUEST 2.0.
    Joseph M; Constant R; Rickloff M; Mezzio A; Valdes K
    J Hand Ther; 2018; 31(4):538-543.e1. PubMed ID: 30318241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthosis Comfort Score: Establishing initial evidence of reliability and validity in ankle foot orthosis users.
    DeZeeuw KG; Dudek N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):478-484. PubMed ID: 31378132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-retest reliability of the Swedish version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
    Jarl G; Holmefur M; Hermansson LM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 23652919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurological patients and their lower limb orthotics: An observational pilot study about acceptance and satisfaction.
    Swinnen E; Lafosse C; Van Nieuwenhoven J; Ilsbroukx S; Beckwée D; Kerckhofs E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Feb; 41(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 26246356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationale for prescription, and effectiveness of, upper limb orthotic intervention for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.
    Garbellini S; Robert Y; Randall M; Elliott C; Imms C
    Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 40(12):1361-1371. PubMed ID: 28286982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. User satisfaction with orthotic devices and service in taiwan.
    Chen CL; Teng YL; Lou SZ; Lin CH; Chen FF; Yeung KT
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110661. PubMed ID: 25338026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' Satisfaction with Lower-limb Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices and Service delivery in Sierra Leone and Malawi.
    Magnusson L; Ahlström G
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Feb; 17(1):102. PubMed ID: 28143549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health-related quality of life and orthosis use in a Swedish population with arthrogryposis.
    Eriksson M; Jylli L; Villard L; Kroksmark AK; Bartonek Å
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):402-409. PubMed ID: 29775129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of orthoses in the treatment of idiopathic toe walking: A randomized controlled trial.
    Herrin K; Geil M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 25628380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments.
    Heinemann AW; Bode RK; O'Reilly C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Dec; 27(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 14727700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Satisfaction survey toward an innovative orthosis for children with cerebral palsy with pes planovalgus.
    Viallard L; Cordillet S; Dohin J; Gaultier O; Maignan L; Rauscent H; Bonan I
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Jan; 48(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 37962349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. User experience of lower-limb orthosis.
    Yang BS; Chen YW; Tong JR
    Assist Technol; 2018; 30(5):267-273. PubMed ID: 28598300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Describe the population receiving orthotic/prosthetic services using telehealth in Australia, and their experience and satisfaction: a quantitative and qualitative investigation.
    Dillon MP; Bishop K; Ridgewell E; Clarke L; Kumar S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Mar; 46(6):1188-1203. PubMed ID: 37070568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of machine learning in the field of prosthetics and orthotics: A systematic narrative review.
    Choo YJ; Chang MC
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Jun; 47(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 36811961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.