355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25429160)
1. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET.
Murthy VL; Lee BC; Sitek A; Naya M; Moody J; Polavarapu V; Ficaro EP; Di Carli MF
J Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 55(12):1952-8. PubMed ID: 25429160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impaired global myocardial flow dynamics despite normal left ventricular function and regional perfusion in chronic kidney disease: a quantitative analysis of clinical 82Rb PET/CT studies.
Fukushima K; Javadi MS; Higuchi T; Bravo PE; Chien D; Lautamäki R; Merrill J; Nekolla SG; Bengel FM
J Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 53(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 22562499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with
Ocneanu AF; deKemp RA; Renaud JM; Adler A; Beanlands RS; Klein R
Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():6810626. PubMed ID: 28293274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water.
Prior JO; Allenbach G; Valenta I; Kosinski M; Burger C; Verdun FR; Bischof Delaloye A; Kaufmann PA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jun; 39(6):1037-47. PubMed ID: 22398957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.
de Souza ACDAH; Harms HJ; Martell L; Bibbo C; Harrington M; Sullivan K; Hainer J; Dorbala S; Blankstein R; Taqueti VR; Foley Kijewski M; Park MA; Meretta A; Breault C; Roth N; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Soman P; Gullberg GT; Di Carli MF
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 15(6):e013987. PubMed ID: 35674051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of temporal sampling for
Lee BC; Moody JB; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1517-1529. PubMed ID: 28508271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blood pool and tissue phase patient motion effects on
Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1918-1929. PubMed ID: 29572594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal validation of myocardial flow reserve PET imaging using stress/rest myocardial activity ratios with Rb-82 and N-13-ammonia.
Juneau D; Wu KY; Kaps N; Yao J; Renaud JM; Beanlands RSB; Ruddy TD; deKemp RA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):835-850. PubMed ID: 33389638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the prognostic value of impaired stress myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and myocardial flow capacity on low-dose Rubidium-82 SiPM PET/CT.
Dietz M; Kamani CH; Allenbach G; Rubimbura V; Fournier S; Dunet V; Treglia G; Nicod Lalonde M; Schaefer N; Eeckhout E; Muller O; Prior JO
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1385-1395. PubMed ID: 36574175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population.
Sunderland JJ; Pan XB; Declerck J; Menda Y
J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25294436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion imaging by 82-rubidium positron emission tomography in male and female patients with angina and no perfusion defects.
Rauf M; Hansen KW; Galatius S; Wiinberg N; Brinth LS; Højstrup S; Talleruphuus U; Prescott E
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 24(2):212-222. PubMed ID: 36394344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Outflow Tract Contributions to 82Rb-PET Global Myocardial Blood Flow Computations.
Van Tosh A; Reichek N; Palestro CJ; Nichols KJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Jun; 44(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26966126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease.
Valenta I; Quercioli A; Schindler TH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 24631507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incremental prognostic value of digital positron emission tomography derived myocardial flow reserve: A prospective cohort study.
Ahmed AI; Al Rifai M; Alahdab F; Saad JM; Han Y; Alfawara MS; Nabi F; Mahmarian JJ; Al-Mallah MH
Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 371():465-471. PubMed ID: 36096273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of clinical tools for measurements of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 13N-ammonia PET/CT.
Slomka PJ; Alexanderson E; Jácome R; Jiménez M; Romero E; Meave A; Le Meunier L; Dalhbom M; Berman DS; Germano G; Schelbert H
J Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 53(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 22228795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia.
Ziadi MC; Dekemp RA; Williams KA; Guo A; Chow BJ; Renaud JM; Ruddy TD; Sarveswaran N; Tee RE; Beanlands RS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 58(7):740-8. PubMed ID: 21816311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of prompt gamma compensation on myocardial blood flow measurements with rubidium-82 dynamic PET.
Armstrong IS; Memmott MJ; Tonge CM; Arumugam P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):596-605. PubMed ID: 27624818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simplified quantification of
Chang CY; Hung GU; Hsu B; Yang BH; Chang CW; Hu LH; Huang WS; Wang HE; Wu TC; Liu RS
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 30324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
