BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25430422)

  • 1. Derivation of a simplified relation for assessing aortic root pressure drop incorporating wall compliance.
    Mohammadi H; Cartier R; Mongrain R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Mar; 53(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 25430422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytical modeling of the instantaneous pressure gradient across the aortic valve.
    Garcia D; Pibarot P; Durand LG
    J Biomech; 2005 Jun; 38(6):1303-11. PubMed ID: 15863115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
    Rifkin RD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The combined role of sinuses of Valsalva and flow pulsatility improves energy loss of the aortic valve.
    Salica A; Pisani G; Morbiducci U; Scaffa R; Massai D; Audenino A; Weltert L; Guerrieri Wolf L; De Paulis R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 49(4):1222-7. PubMed ID: 26362428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical modeling of the instantaneous maximal transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia D; Kadem L; Savéry D; Pibarot P; Durand LG
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3036-44. PubMed ID: 16307750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model.
    Voelker W; Reul H; Nienhaus G; Stelzer T; Schmitz B; Steegers A; Karsch KR
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1196-204. PubMed ID: 7850959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electric analog model of the aortic valve for calculation of continuous beat-to-beat aortic flow using a pressure gradient.
    Graen MD; Ewert DL; Glower JS; Gray LA; Koenig SC
    ASAIO J; 1999; 45(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 10360724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis.
    Laskey WK; Kussmaul WG
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 8281636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro.
    Mascherbauer J; Fuchs C; Stoiber M; Schima H; Pernicka E; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Aug; 29(16):2049-57. PubMed ID: 18502739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neonatal aortic arch hemodynamics and perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Pekkan K; Dur O; Sundareswaran K; Kanter K; Fogel M; Yoganathan A; Undar A
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Dec; 130(6):061012. PubMed ID: 19045541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Differentiated evaluation of heart valve stenosis by expanded Bernoulli equation--in vitro studies of model stenoses].
    Wendt MO; Pohl M; Werner S; Kühnel R; Toppel D
    Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):686-93. PubMed ID: 8525670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve replacement reduces valvuloarterial impedance but does not affect systemic arterial compliance in elderly men with degenerative calcific trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.
    Pagel PS; Schroeder AR; De Vry DJ; Hudetz JA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1540-4. PubMed ID: 25267695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D pulsatile flow in a curved tube with coexisting model of aortic stenosis and coarctation of the aorta.
    Keshavarz-Motamed Z; Kadem L
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Apr; 33(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 21106429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal and stenotic human aortic valve opening: in vitro assessment of orifice area changes with flow.
    Montarello JK; Perakis AC; Rosenthal E; Boyd EG; Yates AK; Deverall PB; Sowton E; Curry PV
    Eur Heart J; 1990 Jun; 11(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 2351157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transaortic gradient is pressure-dependent in a pulsatile model of the circulation.
    Razzolini R; Gerosa G; Leoni L; Casarotto D; Chioin R; Dalla-Volta S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 May; 8(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 10399661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling of the Instantaneous Transvalvular Pressure Gradient in Aortic Stenosis.
    Hatoum H; Mo XM; Crestanello JA; Dasi LP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Aug; 47(8):1748-1763. PubMed ID: 31037445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-vitro comparison of aortic valve hemodynamics between aortic root remodeling and aortic valve reimplantation.
    Graeter TP; Fries R; Aicher D; Reul H; Schmitz C; Schäfers HJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 16784068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet.
    VanAuker MD; Hla A; Meisner JS; Strom JA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 10772051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of pressure recovery location in aortic valve stenosis: an in-vitro validation study.
    Rhodes KD; Stroml JA; Rahman MM; VanAuker MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Sep; 16(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17944120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.