These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25430669)

  • 41. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
    Louden JE; Skeem JL
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
    Butler E; Jacquin K
    Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived.
    McKimmie BM; Masser BM; Bongiorno R
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Aug; 29(12):2273-2303. PubMed ID: 24470567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Perceived credibility of children's sexual abuse allegations: effects of gender and sexual attitudes.
    O'Donohue WT; Elliott AN; Nickerson M; Valentine S
    Violence Vict; 1992; 7(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 1419924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
    Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
    Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Brief research report: age factors affecting the believability of repressed memories of child sexual assault.
    Golding JM; Sanchez RP; Sego SA
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Apr; 23(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 10333759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison of two forms of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases.
    Redlich AD; Myers JE; Goodman GS; Qin J
    Child Maltreat; 2002 Nov; 7(4):312-28. PubMed ID: 12408244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.
    Lynch KR; Wasarhaley NE; Golding JM; Simcic T
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Nov; 28(16):3205-22. PubMed ID: 23929601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Female sexual abuse and criminal justice intervention: a comparison of child protective service and criminal justice samples.
    Bader SM; Scalora MJ; Casady TK; Black S
    Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Jan; 32(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 18093652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mock juror sensitivity to forensic evidence in drug facilitated sexual assaults.
    Schuller RA; Ryan A; Krauss D; Jenkins G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23433947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 21766326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. White mock jurors' moral emotional responses to viewing female victim photographs depend on the victim's race.
    Phalen HJ; Salerno JM; Adamoli M; Nadler J
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):666-685. PubMed ID: 38127550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Statements from Youth in Legal Contexts: Effects of Consistency, Legal Role, and Age.
    Molinaro PF; Malloy LC
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):139-59. PubMed ID: 27021412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
    Keller SR; Wiener RL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.
    Martschuk N; Sporer SL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):441-464. PubMed ID: 33071551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.
    Mugno AP; Klemfuss JZ; Lyon TD
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 26932420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.