These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Introduction to observational studies: part 2. Pandis N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 24485743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality]. Touzet S; Colin C Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research. Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine. Pinto A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cohort studies: part 2. Pandis N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):686-7. PubMed ID: 25439220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Opportunities for minimization of confounding in observational research. Quartey G; Feudjo-Tepie M; Wang J; Kim J Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 22127842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Grimes DA; Schulz KF Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confounding in health research. Greenland S; Morgenstern H Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials. Shahar E; Shahar DJ J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of self-controlled designs in pharmacoepidemiology. Hallas J; PottegÄrd A J Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 275(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24635348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data. Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytic epidemiology and periodontal diseases. Heaton B; Dietrich T Periodontol 2000; 2012 Feb; 58(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 22133370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Study design II. Issues of chance, bias, confounding and contamination. Levin KA Evid Based Dent; 2005; 6(4):102-3. PubMed ID: 16355244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What random assignment does and does not do. Krause MS; Howard KI J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observational studies in radiology. Blackmore CC; Cummings P AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1203-8. PubMed ID: 15505278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis. Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters. Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]