216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25432498)
1. Analysis of expanded criteria to select candidates for active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer.
Jo JK; Lee HS; Lee YI; Lee SE; Hong SK
Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 25432498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis.
Reese AC; Landis P; Han M; Epstein JI; Carter HB
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2033-8. PubMed ID: 23680308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance.
Norman Z; Militza P; Andres F; Daniela F; Alejandro M; Catherine S; Juan F
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24856482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of pathologic progression on biopsy among men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: the value of the pattern of surveillance biopsies.
Cary KC; Cowan JE; Sanford M; Shinohara K; Perez N; Chan JM; Meng MV; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 24035632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols.
Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Manoharan M; Jorda M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 22445138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors for clinically relevant Gleason score upgrade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Thomas C; Pfirrmann K; Pieles F; Bogumil A; Gillitzer R; Wiesner C; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 21592293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?
Chen DJ; Falzarano SM; McKenney JK; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP; Roma A; Jones JS; Stephenson A; Klein E; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2015 Aug; 116(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 25060664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A solitary positive prostate cancer biopsy does not predict a unilateral lesion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Yoneyama T; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
Scand J Urol; 2015 Apr; 49(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25165894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tumor Volume on Biopsy of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.
Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Patel HD; Alam R; Epstein JI; Ross AE; Carter HB
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 29074222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detailed biopsy pathologic features as predictive factors for initial reclassification in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Terry S; Allory Y; Ouzaïd I; Vacherot F; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1060-6. PubMed ID: 22300755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of a "low-risk" cohort of grade group 2 prostate cancer patients: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):611-617. PubMed ID: 28589550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pathologic findings in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients eligible for active surveillance with highly selective criteria: a multicenter study.
Beauval JB; Ploussard G; Soulié M; Pfister C; Van Agt S; Vincendeau S; Larue S; Rigaud J; Gaschignard N; Rouprêt M; Drouin S; Peyromaure M; Long JA; Iborra F; Vallancien G; Rozet F; Salomon L;
Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 22770616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative parameters to predict tumor volume in Japanese patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Furuya Y; Fuse H; Nagakawa O; Masai M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 7(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 12018107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
