These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25432827)
1. Objective assessment of residual nerve tissues in radical prostatectomy specimens by immunohistochemical staining of neuronal nitric oxide synthase-positive nerves and its impact on postoperative erectile function. Miyake H; Behnsawy HM; Hinata N; Fujisawa M Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1395-401. PubMed ID: 25432827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function. Basal S; Wambi C; Acikel C; Gupta M; Badani K BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 23186312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies]. Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients. Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The role of waterjet dissection in improving erectile function and continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy]. Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Rapoport LM; Grigorev NA; Bezrukov EA; Tsarichenko DG; Sirota ES; Martirosyan GA Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28394522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urethral sphincter fatigue after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: descriptive questionnaire-based study and anatomic basis. Hinata N; Murakami G; Miyake H; Tanaka K; Abe S; Fujimiya M; Takenaka A; Fujisawa M Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 24785988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Development of a preoperative criterion to select candidates for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy at Kyoto University Hospital]. Mizuno K; Inoue T; Miyazaki Y; Makino Y; Terada N; Kobayashi T; Yamasaki T; Matsui Y; Kamba T; Yoshimura K; Mikami Y; Ogawa O Hinyokika Kiyo; 2014 Nov; 60(11):543-7. PubMed ID: 25511940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy? Marien TP; Lepor H BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing. Liao PC; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY Anticancer Res; 2020 Jul; 40(7):4075-4080. PubMed ID: 32620655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study. Shim JS; Tae JH; Noh TI; Kang SH; Cheon J; Lee JG; Patel VR; Kang SG J Korean Med Sci; 2022 Jan; 37(1):e6. PubMed ID: 34981681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial. Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurovascular bundle size measured on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging is associated with the recovery of erectile function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kwon T; Lee C; Jung J; Kim CS Urol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):542.e11-542.e17. PubMed ID: 28648413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nerves in the Areas Posterior to the Prostate Base Contribute to Erectile Function: An Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation Assessment. Kaiho Y; Ito J; Iwamura H; Anan G; Kuromoto A; Kudo T; Sato M Urology; 2019 Oct; 132():156-160. PubMed ID: 31306669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]