These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25432828)

  • 1. Editorial comment.
    Whitson JM
    Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1400-1. PubMed ID: 25432828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective assessment of residual nerve tissues in radical prostatectomy specimens by immunohistochemical staining of neuronal nitric oxide synthase-positive nerves and its impact on postoperative erectile function.
    Miyake H; Behnsawy HM; Hinata N; Fujisawa M
    Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1395-401. PubMed ID: 25432827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuroanatomic basis for traction-free preservation of the neural hammock during athermal robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Srivastava A; Grover S; Sooriakumaran P; Tan G; Takenaka A; Tewari AK
    Curr Opin Urol; 2011 Jan; 21(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 21099688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Kim KH; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):367-8. PubMed ID: 22900759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preserving potency after prostate cancer surgery.
    Harv Mens Health Watch; 2002 Sep; 7(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12356553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate cancer surgery: is nerve-sparing safe?
    Harv Mens Health Watch; 2005 Feb; 9(7):4-7. PubMed ID: 15799105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Rodriguez E; Melamud O; Ahlering TE
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18366294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editorial comment.
    Sammon JD; Menon M
    Urology; 2011 Feb; 77(2):506-7. PubMed ID: 21295258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving cancer control and recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: nerve sparing versus nerve resection with grafting.
    Cozzi P
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):834-5. PubMed ID: 18959630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significance of prostate weight on peri and postoperative outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Editorial comment.
    Zorn KC
    Can J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(5):5389. PubMed ID: 20974032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Striving for Trifecta outcomes in localised prostate cancer.
    Barnett C; Kumar P; Challacombe B; Dasgupta P
    Minerva Med; 2011 Aug; 102(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 21959706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective comprehensive assessment of sexual function after retropubic non nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
    Trinchieri A; Nicola M; Masini F; Mangiarotti B
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Dec; 77(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 16444937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: techniques and clinical considerations.
    Gontero P; Kirby RS
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2005; 8(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 15711608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical anatomy of the prostate in the era of radical robotic prostatectomy.
    Walz J; Graefen M; Huland H
    Curr Opin Urol; 2011 May; 21(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 21311334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Editorial comment on: Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
    van der Poel HG
    Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):561-2. PubMed ID: 17683855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial comment on: Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Gontero P
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1144. PubMed ID: 18783874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of sexual function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Carter S; Le JD; Hu JC
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 23169152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional outcomes of 559 cases in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.
    Wattayang P; Nualyong C; Leewansangtong S; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Chaiyaprasithi B; Amornvesukit T; Phinthusophon K; Jitpraphai S; Thiptirapong B; Sujijantararat P; Soontrapa S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Aug; 94(8):941-6. PubMed ID: 21863675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing cancer control and functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy.
    Correa JJ; Pow-Sang JM
    Cancer Control; 2010 Oct; 17(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20861811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting erectile function outcome in men after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Kilminster S; Müller S; Menon M; Joseph JV; Ralph DJ; Patel HR
    BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 22182202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.