These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25432922)
1. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers. Stoop D; Maes E; Polyzos NP; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Nekkebroeck J Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 25432922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive choices and outcomes after freezing oocytes for medical reasons: a follow-up study. Dahhan T; Dancet EA; Miedema DV; van der Veen F; Goddijn M Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 24951490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 10-year follow-up of reproductive outcomes in women attempting motherhood after elective oocyte cryopreservation. Loreti S; Darici E; Nekkebroeck J; Drakopoulos P; Van Landuyt L; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 38145619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve? Bredkjaer HE; Grudzinskas JG Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Jul; 5(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 11753534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experiences and intentions of patients undergoing medically indicated oocyte or embryo cryopreservation: a qualitative study. Bayefsky MJ; Sampson A; Blakemore JK; Jalili D; Lilly AG; Fino ME; Quinn GP Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 37944107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Survey of Women Who Cryopreserved Oocytes for Non-medical Indications (Social Fertility Preservation). Seyhan A; Akin OD; Ertaş S; Ata B; Yakin K; Urman B Reprod Sci; 2021 Aug; 28(8):2216-2222. PubMed ID: 33449346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients. Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons. Hammarberg K; Kirkman M; Pritchard N; Hickey M; Peate M; McBain J; Agresta F; Bayly C; Fisher J Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):575-581. PubMed ID: 28077428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A follow-up survey on the reproductive intentions and experiences of women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation. Wafi A; Nekkebroeck J; Blockeel C; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Feb; 40(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 31983546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer. Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature. Brouillet S; Ranisavljevic N; Sonigo C; Haquet E; Bringer-Deutsch S; Loup-Cabaniols V; Hamamah S; Willems M; Anahory T Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 37381072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oocyte or ovarian tissue banking: decision-making in women aged 35 years or older facing age-related fertility decline. Balkenende EME; van Rooij FB; van der Veen F; Goddijn M Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Aug; 41(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 32600943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of oocyte banking from women intending to circumvent age-related fertility decline. de Groot M; Dancet E; Repping S; Goddijn M; Stoop D; van der Veen F; Gerrits T Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 27623090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study. Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Banking time': egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility. Waldby C Cult Health Sex; 2015; 17(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 25247927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Yu L; Peterson B; Inhorn MC; Boehm JK; Patrizio P Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):403-11. PubMed ID: 26677956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BRCA1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro. Grynberg M; Dagher Hayeck B; Papanikolaou EG; Sifer C; Sermondade N; Sonigo C Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 30561604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Stoop D; Nekkebroeck J; Devroey P Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 21212052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]