614 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25432922)
1. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers.
Stoop D; Maes E; Polyzos NP; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Nekkebroeck J
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 25432922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive choices and outcomes after freezing oocytes for medical reasons: a follow-up study.
Dahhan T; Dancet EA; Miedema DV; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 24951490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 10-year follow-up of reproductive outcomes in women attempting motherhood after elective oocyte cryopreservation.
Loreti S; Darici E; Nekkebroeck J; Drakopoulos P; Van Landuyt L; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 38145619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?
Bredkjaer HE; Grudzinskas JG
Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Jul; 5(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 11753534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experiences and intentions of patients undergoing medically indicated oocyte or embryo cryopreservation: a qualitative study.
Bayefsky MJ; Sampson A; Blakemore JK; Jalili D; Lilly AG; Fino ME; Quinn GP
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 37944107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Survey of Women Who Cryopreserved Oocytes for Non-medical Indications (Social Fertility Preservation).
Seyhan A; Akin OD; Ertaş S; Ata B; Yakin K; Urman B
Reprod Sci; 2021 Aug; 28(8):2216-2222. PubMed ID: 33449346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons.
Hammarberg K; Kirkman M; Pritchard N; Hickey M; Peate M; McBain J; Agresta F; Bayly C; Fisher J
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):575-581. PubMed ID: 28077428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A follow-up survey on the reproductive intentions and experiences of women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation.
Wafi A; Nekkebroeck J; Blockeel C; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Feb; 40(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 31983546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial.
Kolibianakis EM; Venetis CA; Bosdou JK; Zepiridis L; Chatzimeletiou K; Makedos A; Masouridou S; Triantafillidis S; Mitsoli A; Tarlatzis BC
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 25492411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature.
Brouillet S; Ranisavljevic N; Sonigo C; Haquet E; Bringer-Deutsch S; Loup-Cabaniols V; Hamamah S; Willems M; Anahory T
Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 37381072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oocyte or ovarian tissue banking: decision-making in women aged 35 years or older facing age-related fertility decline.
Balkenende EME; van Rooij FB; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Aug; 41(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 32600943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of oocyte banking from women intending to circumvent age-related fertility decline.
de Groot M; Dancet E; Repping S; Goddijn M; Stoop D; van der Veen F; Gerrits T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 27623090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.
Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Banking time': egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility.
Waldby C
Cult Health Sex; 2015; 17(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 25247927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study.
Courbiere B; Decanter C; Bringer-Deutsch S; Rives N; Mirallié S; Pech JC; De Ziegler D; Carré-Pigeon F; May-Panloup P; Sifer C; Amice V; Schweitzer T; Porcu-Buisson G; Poirot C;
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2381-8. PubMed ID: 23832792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians.
Yu L; Peterson B; Inhorn MC; Boehm JK; Patrizio P
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):403-11. PubMed ID: 26677956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BRCA1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro.
Grynberg M; Dagher Hayeck B; Papanikolaou EG; Sifer C; Sermondade N; Sonigo C
Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 30561604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age.
Stoop D; Nekkebroeck J; Devroey P
Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 21212052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]