83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25433452)
1. Do pathological parameters differ with regard to breast density and mode of detection in breast cancer? The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study.
Sartor H; Borgquist S; Hartman L; Zackrisson S
Breast; 2015 Feb; 24(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 25433452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do mammographic tumor features in breast cancer relate to breast density and invasiveness, tumor size, and axillary lymph node involvement?
Sartor H; Borgquist S; Hartman L; Olsson Å; Jawdat F; Zackrisson S
Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):536-44. PubMed ID: 24814360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer and clinical outcome among women over 60 years of age: a plead for more screening and alternative treatments.
Sennerstam RB; Wiksell H; Schässburger KU; Auer GU
Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol; 2012 Aug; 34(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 23016465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics.
Eriksson L; Czene K; Rosenberg L; Humphreys K; Hall P
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jul; 134(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 22710708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using tumor phenotype, histological tumor distribution, and mammographic appearance to explain the survival differences between screen-detected and clinically detected breast cancers.
Chuang SL; Chen SL; Yu CP; Chang KJ; Yen AM; Chiu SY; Fann JC; Tabár L; Stephen DW; Smith RA; Chen HH
APMIS; 2014 Aug; 122(8):699-707. PubMed ID: 25046200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics.
Aiello EJ; Buist DS; White E; Porter PL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Mar; 14(3):662-8. PubMed ID: 15767347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BMI and breast cancer prognosis benefit: mammography screening reveals differences between normal weight and overweight women.
Crispo A; Grimaldi M; D'Aiuto M; Rinaldo M; Capasso I; Amore A; D'Aiuto G; Giudice A; Ciliberto G; Montella M
Breast; 2015 Feb; 24(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 25466863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic features at primary breast cancer diagnosis in relation to recurrence-free survival.
Lång K; Sturesdotter L; Bengtsson Y; Larsson AM; Sartor H
Breast; 2024 Jun; 75():103736. PubMed ID: 38663074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of mammography screening attendance and detection mode in predicting breast cancer survival-is there added prognostic value?
Biesheuvel C; Czene K; Orgeás CC; Hall P
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 21470933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What effect does mammographic breast density have on lesion detection in digital mammography?
A L Mousa DS; Ryan EA; Mello-Thoms C; Brennan PC
Clin Radiol; 2014 Apr; 69(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 24424328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women treated with breast conserving surgery do better than those with mastectomy independent of detection mode, prognostic and predictive tumor characteristics.
Hofvind S; Holen Å; Aas T; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Akslen LA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1417-22. PubMed ID: 26253193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of HER2-positive breast cancer diagnosed following the introduction of universal HER2 testing.
Pathmanathan N; Provan PJ; Mahajan H; Hall G; Byth K; Bilous AM; Balleine RL
Breast; 2012 Dec; 21(6):724-9. PubMed ID: 23099207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy.
Barth RJ; Gibson GR; Carney PA; Mott LA; Becher RD; Poplack SP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):324-9. PubMed ID: 15615996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast density and mode of detection in relation to breast cancer specific survival: a cohort study.
Olsson Å; Sartor H; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Manjer J
BMC Cancer; 2014 Mar; 14():229. PubMed ID: 24678853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumour-related factors and prognosis in breast cancer detected by screening.
Olsson A; Borgquist S; Butt S; Zackrisson S; Landberg G; Manjer J
Br J Surg; 2012 Jan; 99(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 22068957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
