These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25434558)

  • 1. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in early detection of implant failure.
    Yepes JF; Al-Sabbagh M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 59(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 25434558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report.
    Benavides E; Rios HF; Ganz SD; An CH; Resnik R; Reardon GT; Feldman SJ; Mah JK; Hatcher D; Kim MJ; Sohn DS; Palti A; Perel ML; Judy KW; Misch CE; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 22382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites.
    Hatcher DC; Dial C; Mayorga C
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 14696834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Osseointegration in Implants using Digital Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Chopra A; Mhapuskar AA; Marathe S; Nisa SU; Thopte S; Saddiwal R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):953-957. PubMed ID: 27965508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study.
    Salimov F; Tatli U; Kürkçü M; Akoğlan M; Oztunç H; Kurtoğlu C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1016-21. PubMed ID: 23772811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):561-95. PubMed ID: 24993924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard.
    Corpas Ldos S; Jacobs R; Quirynen M; Huang Y; Naert I; Duyck J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):492-9. PubMed ID: 21143531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible.
    Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA
    N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
    Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Dental Implant Patient.
    Klokkevold PR
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):521-30. PubMed ID: 26820009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restricting preoperative diagnosis to two-dimensional images in oral implantology can potentially cause implant failures.
    Almog DM
    Alpha Omegan; 2010 Dec; 103(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 21313964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography.
    Yoshimine S; Nishihara K; Nozoe E; Yoshimine M; Nakamura N
    Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.