311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25435282)
1. Comparison of insertion/deletion calling algorithms on human next-generation sequencing data.
Ghoneim DH; Myers JR; Tuttle E; Paciorkowski AR
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Dec; 7():864. PubMed ID: 25435282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimized detection of insertions/deletions (INDELs) in whole-exome sequencing data.
Kim BY; Park JH; Jo HY; Koo SK; Park MH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182272. PubMed ID: 28792971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of indel calling tools using real short-read data.
Hasan MS; Wu X; Zhang L
Hum Genomics; 2015 Aug; 9(1):20. PubMed ID: 26286629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenge of detecting indels in bacterial genomes from short-read sequencing data.
Steglich M; Nübel U
J Biotechnol; 2017 May; 250():11-15. PubMed ID: 28267569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detailed comparison of two popular variant calling packages for exome and targeted exon studies.
Warden CD; Adamson AW; Neuhausen SL; Wu X
PeerJ; 2014; 2():e600. PubMed ID: 25289185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of INDEL Calling Tools with Simulation Data and Real Short-Read Data.
Li D; Kim W; Wang L; Yoon KA; Park B; Park C; Kong SY; Hwang Y; Baek D; Lee ES; Won S
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(5):1635-1644. PubMed ID: 30004886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole genome and exome sequencing data.
Fang H; Wu Y; Narzisi G; O'Rawe JA; Barrón LT; Rosenbaum J; Ronemus M; Iossifov I; Schatz MC; Lyon GJ
Genome Med; 2014; 6(10):89. PubMed ID: 25426171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vindel: a simple pipeline for checking indel redundancy.
Li Z; Wu X; He B; Zhang L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):359. PubMed ID: 25407965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The distribution and mutagenesis of short coding INDELs from 1,128 whole exomes.
Challis D; Antunes L; Garrison E; Banks E; Evani US; Muzny D; Poplin R; Gibbs RA; Marth G; Yu F
BMC Genomics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 25765891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants.
Cacheiro P; Ordóñez-Ugalde A; Quintáns B; Piñeiro-Hermida S; Amigo J; García-Murias M; Pascual-Pascual SI; Grandas F; Arpa J; Carracedo A; Sobrido MJ
Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Jun; 21(3):303-313. PubMed ID: 28290094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. mInDel: a high-throughput and efficient pipeline for genome-wide InDel marker development.
Lv Y; Liu Y; Zhao H
BMC Genomics; 2016 Apr; 17():290. PubMed ID: 27079510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analytical workflow for accurate variant discovery in highly divergent regions.
Tian S; Yan H; Neuhauser C; Slager SL
BMC Genomics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):703. PubMed ID: 27590916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A universal algorithm for de novo decrypting of heterozygous indel sequences: a tool for personalized medicine.
Lam CW
Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Mar; 389(1-2):7-13. PubMed ID: 18078814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Amplicon Indel Hunter Is a Novel Bioinformatics Tool to Detect Large Somatic Insertion/Deletion Mutations in Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Kadri S; Zhen CJ; Wurst MN; Long BC; Jiang ZF; Wang YL; Furtado LV; Segal JP
J Mol Diagn; 2015 Nov; 17(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 26319364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Split-Read Indel and Structural Variant Calling Using PINDEL.
Ye K; Guo L; Yang X; Lamijer EW; Raine K; Ning Z
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1833():95-105. PubMed ID: 30039366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing.
O'Rawe J; Jiang T; Sun G; Wu Y; Wang W; Hu J; Bodily P; Tian L; Hakonarson H; Johnson WE; Wei Z; Wang K; Lyon GJ
Genome Med; 2013; 5(3):28. PubMed ID: 23537139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of insertion-deletion from deep-sequencing data: software evaluation for optimal detection.
Neuman JA; Isakov O; Shomron N
Brief Bioinform; 2013 Jan; 14(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 22707752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
