These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25435746)

  • 1. Accuracy of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan.
    Moon SW; Lim SH; Lee HY
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):444-50. PubMed ID: 25435746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in eyes with short and long axial lengths.
    Karabela Y; Eliacik M; Kaya F
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 16():96. PubMed ID: 27391470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Rajan MS; Keilhorn I; Bell JA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Sep; 16(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 12194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using partial coherence interferometry in patients with high myopia.
    Roessler GF; Dietlein TS; Plange N; Roepke AK; Dinslage S; Walter P; Mazinani BA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 22512374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery.
    Drexler W; Findl O; Menapace R; Rainer G; Vass C; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Oct; 126(4):524-34. PubMed ID: 9780097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
    Engren AL; Behndig A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 23395354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation.
    Olsen T; Hoffmann P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):764-73. PubMed ID: 24767910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.
    Wang JK; Hu CY; Chang SW
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 18242451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
    Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods.
    Abulafia A; Barrett GD; Rotenberg M; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Reitblat O; Koch DD; Wang L; Assia EI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):548-56. PubMed ID: 25708208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound biometry vs. IOL Master.
    Roy A; Das S; Sahu SK; Rath S
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1937.e1-2. PubMed ID: 22944497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Immersion Ultrasound Biometry.
    Turhan SA; Toker E
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 26114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
    An Y; Kang EK; Kim H; Kang MJ; Byun YS; Joo CK
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30678658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular lens formula constant optimization and partial coherence interferometry biometry: Refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery.
    Aristodemou P; Knox Cartwright NE; Sparrow JM; Johnston RL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 37(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 21183099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster).
    Ha A; Wee WR; Kim MK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 29770644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of fellow eye data in the calculation of intraocular lens power for the second eye.
    Olsen T
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1710-5. PubMed ID: 21723613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction error after pediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation: Contact versus immersion A-scan biometry.
    Trivedi RH; Wilson ME
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 37(3):501-5. PubMed ID: 21333874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the biometric formulas used for applanation A-scan ultrasound biometry.
    Özcura F; Aktaş S; Sağdık HM; Tetikoğlu M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 36(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 26854320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.