1275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25436913)
1. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
Kovatchev BP; Patek SD; Ortiz EA; Breton MD
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 25436913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: Results of an Emergent Pilot Study.
Sadhu AR; Serrano IA; Xu J; Nisar T; Lucier J; Pandya AR; Patham B
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 14(6):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 33063556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of Inpatient CGM: Comparison to Standard of Care.
Price C; Ditton G; Russell GB; Aloi J
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2023 Mar; 17(2):329-335. PubMed ID: 34911384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Numerical and clinical precision of continuous glucose monitoring in Colombian patients treated with insulin infusion pump with automated suspension in hypoglycemia.
Gómez AM; Marín Sánchez A; Muñoz OM; Colón Peña CA
Endocrinol Nutr; 2015 Dec; 62(10):485-92. PubMed ID: 26531841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a new real-time continuous glucose monitoring algorithm.
Keenan DB; Cartaya R; Mastrototaro JJ
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 4(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 20167174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.
Zaharieva DP; Turksoy K; McGaugh SM; Pooni R; Vienneau T; Ly T; Riddell MC
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 Jun; 21(6):313-321. PubMed ID: 31059282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hypoglycemic Accuracy and Improved Low Glucose Alerts of the Latest Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
Peyser TA; Nakamura K; Price D; Bohnett LC; Hirsch IB; Balo A
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Aug; 17(8):548-54. PubMed ID: 25961446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extensive Assessment of Blood Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Period and Its Impact on Closed-Loop Performance.
Biagi L; Hirata Bertachi A; Conget I; Quirós C; Giménez M; Ampudia-Blasco FJ; Rossetti P; Bondia J; Vehí J
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 28633537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.
Laffel L
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Rodbard D
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3-S13. PubMed ID: 26784127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate of Change of Premeal Glucose Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Predicts Postmeal Glycemic Excursions in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Implications for Therapy.
Majithia AR; Wiltschko AB; Zheng H; Walford GA; Nathan DM
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Jan; 12(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 28868899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in infants.
Tomotaki S; Toyoshima K; Shimokaze T; Kawai M
Pediatr Int; 2019 Oct; 61(10):1001-1006. PubMed ID: 31287607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy assessment of online glucose monitoring by a subcutaneous enzymatic glucose sensor during exercise in patients with type 1 diabetes treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Radermecker RP; Fayolle C; Brun JF; Bringer J; Renard E
Diabetes Metab; 2013 May; 39(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 23522730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and Performance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Guide Computerized Insulin Infusion Therapy in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit.
Ang L; Lin YK; Schroeder LF; Huang Y; DeGeorge CA; Arnold P; Akanbi F; Knotts S; DuBois E; Desbrough N; Qu Y; Freeman R; Esfandiari NH; Pop-Busui R; Gianchandani R
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):562-569. PubMed ID: 38563491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Zueger T; Diem P; Mougiakakou S; Stettler C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 22512266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimizing postprandial hypoglycemia in Type 1 diabetes patients using multiple insulin injections and capillary blood glucose self-monitoring with machine learning techniques.
Oviedo S; Contreras I; Bertachi A; Quirós C; Giménez M; Conget I; Vehi J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Sep; 178():175-180. PubMed ID: 31416546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrofitting Real-Life Dexcom G5 Data.
Favero SD; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):237-245. PubMed ID: 28287834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Future Products, and Update on Worldwide Artificial Pancreas Projects.
Kropff J; DeVries JH
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S253-63. PubMed ID: 26784131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]