BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25437141)

  • 21. Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation.
    Lundin K; Stillesjö F; Rask-Andersen H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 25798647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The electrically evoked cortical auditory event-related potential in children with auditory brainstem implants.
    He S; Teagle HF; Ewend M; Henderson L; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):377-9. PubMed ID: 25426662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    Shallop JK; Beiter AL; Goin DW; Mischke RE
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 2307303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adult Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes and Three-Dimensional Electrode Array Position on Computed Tomography.
    Egra-Dagan D; van Beurden I; Barber SR; Carter CL; Cunnane ME; Brown MC; Herrmann BS; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1741-1754. PubMed ID: 34282087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The value of intraoperative EABRs in auditory brainstem implantation.
    Anwar A; Singleton A; Fang Y; Wang B; Shapiro W; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():158-163. PubMed ID: 28964288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A guide to the positioning of brainstem implants using intraoperative electrical auditory brainstem responses.
    Nevison B
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():154-166. PubMed ID: 16891841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
    Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory brainstem implant outcomes and MAP parameters: report of experiences in adults and children.
    Goffi-Gomez MV; Magalhães AT; Brito Neto R; Tsuji RK; Gomes Mde Q; Bento RF
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 76(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 22226602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating Auditory Pathway by Electrical Auditory Middle Latency Response and Postoperative Hearing Rehabilitation.
    Wang B; Cao K; Wei C; Gao Z; Li H
    J Invest Surg; 2019 Sep; 32(6):542-551. PubMed ID: 29537890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory brainstem implants in neurofibromatosis Type 2: is open speech perception feasible?
    Matthies C; Brill S; Varallyay C; Solymosi L; Gelbrich G; Roosen K; Ernestus RI; Helms J; Hagen R; Mlynski R; Shehata-Dieler W; Müller J
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Feb; 120(2):546-58. PubMed ID: 24329026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory brainstem implantation: the University of Verona experience.
    Colletti V; Fiorino F; Carner M; Sacchetto L; Miorelli V; Orsi A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Jul; 127(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 12161736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monitoring the electrode position during acoustic neuroma surgery.
    Frohne C; Lesinski A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S95-6. PubMed ID: 9391615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds.
    Smith DW; Finley CC; van den Honert C; Olszyk VB; Konrad KE
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 7737916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Longitudinal Changes in Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Children With Auditory Brainstem Implants: Preliminary Results Recorded Over 3 Years.
    He S; Teagle HFB; McFayden TC; Ewend M; Henderson L; He N; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):318-325. PubMed ID: 28891823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detailed insight in intraoperative eABR measurements to assist auditory brainstem implantation in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2.
    Lachowska M; Pastuszka A; Mikołajewska L; Kunert P; Niemczyk K
    Acta Neurol Belg; 2020 Dec; 120(6):1371-1378. PubMed ID: 31749088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory brainstem implant in posttraumatic cochlear nerve avulsion.
    Colletti V; Carner M; Miorelli V; Colletti L; Guida M; Fiorino F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):247-55. PubMed ID: 15205552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: duration effects.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):7-14. PubMed ID: 18692121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.
    Otto SR; Shannon RV; Wilkinson EP; Hitselberger WE; McCreery DB; Moore JK; Brackmann DE
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1147-54. PubMed ID: 18931643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.