These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25438856)

  • 1. In vitro enamel thickness measurements with ultrasound.
    Sindi KH; Bubb NL; Gutteridge DL; Evans JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 25438856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonic measurement of enamel thickness: a tool for monitoring dental erosion?
    Huysmans MC; Thijssen JM
    J Dent; 2000 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 10709340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of ultrasound measurement of progressive change in occlusal enamel thickness.
    Bozkurt FO; Tagtekin DA; Hayran O; Stookey GK; Yanikoglu FC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jan; 99(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 15599355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Refining enamel thickness measurements from B-mode ultrasound images.
    Hua J; Chen SK; Kim Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():440-3. PubMed ID: 19964934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo reproducibility study of ultrasound for monitoring enamel thickness.
    Sindi KH; Bubb NL; Evans JA; Gutteridge DL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jul; 118(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 24908603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of tooth wear by estimating enamel thickness with quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.
    Kim SK; Park SW; Lee HS; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():319-324. PubMed ID: 30648640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro longitudinal evaluation of enamel wear by cross-polarization optical coherence tomography.
    Alghilan MA; Lippert F; Platt JA; Eckert GJ; González-Cabezas C; Fried D; Hara AT
    Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1464-1470. PubMed ID: 31395451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity of FluoreCam for white-spot lesion detection: An in vitro study.
    Abufarwa M; Noureldin A; Campbell PM; Buschang PH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Feb; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 28631885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Susceptibility of enamel to initial erosion in relation to tooth type, tooth surface and enamel depth.
    Carvalho TS; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25592786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visualization of localized elastic properties in human tooth and jawbone as revealed by scanning acoustic microscopy.
    Shelke A; Blume M; Mularczyk M; Landes C; Sader R; Bereiter-Hahn J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 May; 39(5):853-9. PubMed ID: 23465135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carotid atherosclerotic plaque characterisation by measurement of ultrasound sound speed in vitro at high frequency, 20 MHz.
    Brewin MP; Srodon PD; Greenwald SE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):428-41. PubMed ID: 23683797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Non-destructive ultrasonic technique of enamel thickness measurement].
    Rusanov FS; Maev RG; Titov SA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2012; 91(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 23011323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of DIAGNOdent and two conventional diagnostic methods.
    Reis A; Zach VL; de Lima AC; de Lima Navarro MF; Grande RH
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):76-82. PubMed ID: 15688963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual inspection, radiographic examination, laser fluorescence and their combinations on treatment decisions for occlusal surfaces.
    Valera FB; Pessan JP; Valera RC; Mondelli J; Percinoto C
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18435372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic ultrasound tooth imaging using fractional Fourier transform.
    Harput S; Evans T; Bubb N; Freear S
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2096-106. PubMed ID: 21989873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of dental samples using a 35MHz focussed ultrasound piezocomposite transducer.
    Hughes DA; Girkin JM; Poland S; Longbottom C; Button TW; Elgoyhen J; Hughes H; Meggs C; Cochran S
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 18930302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reproducibility of ultrasonic enamel thickness measurements: an in vitro study.
    Louwerse C; Kjaeldgaard M; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2004 Jan; 32(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 14659722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thickness measurement of worn molar cusps by ultrasound.
    Arslantunali Tagtekin D; Oztürk F; Lagerweij M; Hayran O; Stookey GK; Caliskan Yanikoglu F
    Caries Res; 2005; 39(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 15741727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new index of tooth wear. Reproducibility and application to a sample of 18- to 30-year-old university students.
    Fares J; Shirodaria S; Chiu K; Ahmad N; Sherriff M; Bartlett D
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 19321989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An efficient sound speed estimation method to enhance image resolution in ultrasound imaging.
    Cho MH; Kang LH; Kim JS; Lee SY
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Dec; 49(8):774-8. PubMed ID: 19635626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.